GLASGOW is set to miss a 2030 zero carbon target by up to 40%, officials have admitted.
The cost to the city to try and reach the green milestone is predicted to be at least £23 billion depending on what methods are used.
The city’s Scottish Green councillors have released a statement calling for immediate action to get Glasgow back on track for its 2030 targets after the issues were highlighted in a report.
Councillor Lana Reid-McConnell said: “This report details that on our current trajectory, we will only achieve 60% of our 2030 net zero target for the city.
READ MORE: Opportunity for Scottish firms in Japan is massive, says new trade envoy
“It’s now incumbent on Glasgow City Council and other major stakeholders in Glasgow to ramp up the pace at which we transform into a net zero city and it’s equally important that the Scottish Government and UK Government support us to do so. We must do better as we witness persistent climate events, destroying and threatening the lives of many people globally.”
The Scottish Government has scrapped its climate change targets admitting that cutting emissions by 75% by 2030 was out of reach.
In Glasgow, two possible pathways leading towards a net zero goal have been put forward in a paper to be presented to next week’s net zero and climate progress monitoring city policy committee.
A ‘projected pathway’ costing £23.5bn and an ‘accelerated pathway’ needing £36.8bn investment have been developed.
The projected pathway would reduce emissions by 60% and would focus on more walking, cycling, shared public transport and lower use of electricity.
The accelerated pathway option would rely on a huge switch to electric vehicles in the public and private sector as well as the council leading by example on developing and delivering heat networks. It would reduce emissions by 80%.
The council report also warned Glasgow would be unable to plant enough trees to meet its own carbon removal needs.
The report said the local authority would need to look at a “regional or national approach to supporting the development of sequestration opportunities, requiring collaboration with other landowners and local authorities.”
Councillor Reid-McConnell (above) who chairs the net zero commitee added: “The majority of our emissions as a city come from transport and the built environment. We need Government support to progress bus franchising at a faster rate, accompanied with a major roll out of green infrastructure including bus lanes, cycle lanes and liveable neighbourhoods.
“We have the opportunity to really push community owned energy as part of our energy and buildings infrastructure shift. Glasgow City Council have been developing a framework to help provide suitable land and buildings within Glasgow however we need more resources to support communities to skill up in how to do this and funding to make it happen.
“Money should be flowing into our communities, not the pockets of billionaire oil CEOs.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here