A GLASGOW-BASED agriculture company has been fined £80,000 after an employee sustained several serious injuries due to a breach in health and safety rules.
Grayshill Limited, a company specialising in the removal and disposal of fallen livestock, pleaded guilty to breaching health and safety regulations after an employee suffered a skull fracture, a broken clavicle, a ripped earlobe and haematomas down his right side.
An investigation found this was caused by being struck by a telehandler bucket while working at Grayshill Limited on 19 October 2022. The worker had been removing cattle from the back of a lorry when a telehandler bucket detached and struck him.
A telehandler is a vehicle used for transporting heavy materials and is commonly used in the construction and agricultural sectors. They can alternate attachments for the vehicle’s arm from a forklift, or a bucket similar to that found on diggers.
READ MORE: Will Labour's tax raid ruin Scottish farmers – or are they at it?
The Health and Safety Executive (HSE), the national regulator for workplace health and safety procedures, concluded that the firm had failed to implement a safe system of work.
The HSE found that the incident was caused when a quick hitch, a latching device which connects a bucket to a telehandler’s arm, had not been reinserted.
A manual quick hitch requires an operator to manually insert a metal pin from the latching device to secure the attachment.
On the morning of October 19 2022, a self-employed agricultural engineer had serviced the vehicle, which involved removing the bucket. The engineer then proceeded to incorrectly reattach it onto the telehandler after the service was complete, it was found.
HSE principal inspector Hazel Dobb said this was a serious incident that had resulted in a worker sustaining horrific injuries.
She said: "We thoroughly investigated this incident and found Grayshill failed to carry out the correct control measures and safe working practices at its site in Glasgow.
"The company also failed to check its vehicles after they had been serviced and repaired to ensure they were safe for use.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here