THE SNP are set to lodge a series of amendments in an attempt to sabotage Labour's House of Lords legislation.
It comes as the bill is set to come before the House of Commons on Tuesday.
SNP deputy leader Pete Wishart will lodge an amendment to see the Lords abolished entirely, but he will also lodge a further amendment to force peers to pay income tax on their parliamentary pay.
The tax-free pay — currently worth up to £361 per day — is payable to members of the House of Lords for any day they turn up in Parliament, even just to sign in to confirm their attendance.
READ MORE: Wee Ginger Dug: Labour have once again broken their promises on Lords reform
Last year, lords claimed more than £20 million in attendance allowances — all tax free. The SNP said that this means peers avoided up to £9m in income tax last year.
The cost of the House of Lords was also £212m in 2023, according to research from the House of Commons Library commissioned by the SNP.
Wishart (below) has now challenged Labour MPs in Scotland to back his amendments which he says are the “only viable option for anyone who believes in democracy.”
He said: “Unlike the Westminster parties, the SNP want the House of Lords abolished – plain and simple. There’s no justification for this undemocratic and outdated institution to exist any longer and it’s a complete joke for their members not to pay a single penny of income tax on their salary for simply turning up.
“At the very least Scottish Labour MPs should join me in forcing Lords to cough up and pay tax on their £342 a day pay – that’s the only viable option for anyone who believes in democracy, but if they won’t then they must explain to voters why they believe they should pay tax, but ermine clad Labour big wigs in the Lords shouldn’t."
The senior SNP figure added: “The Labour Party has repeatedly broken its promise to abolish the House of Lords for more than a century and, frankly, this embarrassingly limited bill is 114 years too little, too late. Voters were promised change, but instead Sir Keir Starmer has ripped up his election pledges, and continued stuffing the Lords with Labour Party donors and cronies as it suits him.
"The undemocratic House of Lords is an archaic institution of the kind you'd find in a banana republic and it's second-only in size to the Congress of China costing taxpayers more than £200m a year. If it was any other country, the government would rightly think it utterly corrupt, but while the Labour Party may have watered down their promises on Lords reform, our values in the SNP remain clear – abolish it and abolish it now.”
A House of Lords spokesperson said: “Mr Wishart’s statement concerns amendments he is seeking to table to legislation before the House of Commons. As such it would not be appropriate for the House of Lords Administration to comment of the merits or otherwise of his amendments.
“In terms of a factual response to the issues he raises, Members of the House of Lords do not receive a salary. They are eligible to claim attendance allowance for days they attend the House and undertake Parliamentary duties. Like MPs not all work undertaken by Members of the Lords takes place in the Chamber and voting lobbies, so it would be wrong to conclude that a member had done no work based on a Hansard search alone.
“The House of Lords is a busy and effective revising Chamber. The allowances system is designed to ensure Members from all parts of the UK can make an important contribution to improving legislation and holding the Government to account.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel