THE royal family have been branded “out of touch” after Balmoral Castle launched an online shop selling upmarket products, including a tartan throw that will set you back almost £1000.
The shop has been launched as part of King Charles’s plans to make Balmoral more accessible to the public. He allowed public tours of the private residence in Aberdeenshire this summer for the first time at £100 a ticket, with visitors who wanted afternoon tea forced to fork out an extra £50.
Now admirers of the late Queen Elizabeth can enjoy shopping for products made using the newly-launched Balmoral hunting tartan, but they’ll need more than a bit of spare change.
Items include a £962 cashmere throw, a scarf priced at nearly £400, a shawl on sale for £140 and a lambswool hot water bottle costing £75.
READ MORE: SNP plot to sabotage Labour's House of Lords bill
The £962 throw is described as the “perfect gift for interiors lovers or simply as a special gift to yourself, this throw encapsulates the rich heritage and natural beauty of Balmoral Castle and Estate, offering a piece of Scottish legacy you can cherish for years to come”.
The most expensive item available is a £2050 hand-engraved crystal glass bowl, featuring a 3D image of the castle and the surrounding grounds.
Other high-end products include a deerskin zip-top backpack for £750, a thistle tall lamp for £365 and a Balmoral tweed wool throw for £285.
Tristan Grayford, of Scottish anti-monarchy group Our Republic, said these prices underscore “the continued disconnect” between the royals and the daily lives of the public and raises questions about their image as being “champions of charity”.
He told The National: “The Balmoral online shop’s launch highlights the royal family’s continued promotion of luxury products associated with their brand.
“Far from the monarchy's carefully crafted image of champions of charity, this shows themselves yet again profiting from their status - as if what they raked in from the public purse wasn't enough.
“These prices are completely out of reach for most people, and they underscore the continued disconnect between the royal institution and the daily realities of the public.
“At a time when many households are facing economic hardship, the launch of this exclusive, high-priced product line is extravagant and out of touch, serving as a reminder of the privileges attached to the monarchy.”
Balmoral was purchased for Queen Victoria by Prince Albert in 1852 and was widely thought to be Elizabeth’s favourite residence.
Other items in the shop include a range of luxury crockery, including a £150 tartan teapot, fine bone china plates priced at £69 each and matching cups embossed with Balmoral insignia at £39 each.
The shop also sells a Balmoral Hunting tartan tie costs £65, and a hair scrunchie for £25.
READ MORE: David Hayman launches major survey on land reform in Scotland
Adrian Swinscoe, of the Edinburgh branch of Republic, said: “These sorts of items and prices are indicative of how out of touch the monarchy are from the experience of the regular person on the high street.
“To charge nearly £1000 for a throw and think that that’s relevant to the normal person on the street, it’s just ridiculous. It just shows you how out of touch they are.”
It comes after the Channel 4 Dispatches programme revealed the King and the Prince of Wales’ private estates have struck rental deals worth millions of pounds with the armed forces, the NHS and state schools.
An investigation by the programme and the Sunday Times examined the land and properties the two leading royals own through the Duchies of Lancaster and Cornwall.
The investigation reported that last year the Duchy of Lancaster agreed a deal to store a new fleet of electric ambulances, owned by Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Trust in London, in one of the estate’s warehouses at a cost of £11.4 million over 15 years.
It also said the Duchy of Cornwall had charged the navy more than £1m since 2004 to build and use jetties and moor warships on the Cornish coastline.
The duchy will also earn around £600,000 over the lifetime of six different leases agreed with local state schools, the investigation found.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel