A FISHING industry body has hit out at a conservation group, accusing them of spreading "fake news" in an upcoming report.
Based in the north east, the Scottish Fisherman's Federation (SFF) has claimed a report published by Oceana, which calls for the "legally binding deadline to end overfishing", is attempting to disrupt upcoming annual talks on fishing quotas.
The report claims nearly eight in 10 adults in Britain support stricter limits on catches in UK waters.
The survey was carried out by More in Common on behalf of Oceana with 2073 adults across Scotland, England and Wales questioned.
Federation bosses said the report could disrupt the talks, stating that the group is "wasting everyone’s time with a series of cherry-picked statements, reliance on obsolete science and creative wording to perpetuate a narrative of gloom and doom about fisheries that bears little relation to reality".
READ MORE: True North Sea oil spill levels 'double' official reports, study finds
SFF chief executive Elspeth Macdonald questioned in the Press and Journal, “who funds Oceana?", before asking who the group represents.
She added: "What gives it the right to try to influence policy and fisheries negotiations that will be critical for the livelihoods of our members next year and in the years ahead, with such a farrago of nonsense?
“If they are going to take issue with the sector, eNGOs (environmental non-governmental organisations) should save themselves from embarrassment by getting their facts and analysis right.”
Macdonald defended the industry, stating more than 70% of Scotland’s commercially-caught species are sustainable, that fish has the lowest carbon footprint of almost any food and "the industry has the clearest vested interest in being responsible custodians of our stocks".
She added: “SFF will continue to concentrate its efforts on co-operating with governments to implement practicable and reasonable policies and management measures instead of fantasies dreamt up in corporate boardrooms by people who have never been on a fishing boat in their lives.”
Launching its report, Oceana said: “Eight in ten Brits are concerned about the impacts of declining fish populations on ocean wildlife such as seabirds and dolphins.
“And 78% backed Oceana’s calls for stricter limits on catches in UK seas, in line with what scientists say is sustainable.”
The group's UK executive director Hugo Tagholm said: “Overfishing in UK waters, and the destruction of ocean wildlife it drives, is fundamentally a political choice.
“Year-on-year, catch limits have been set too high, with no regard for those small, local boats that need healthy seas to survive.
“Right now, we are allowing wealthy corporations to asset-strip our seas and move on, with no regard for coastal communities or our heritage as an ocean nation.
“Ending overfishing would bring back the abundance of our seas, provide resilience in the face of the climate crisis, and boost coastal economies. It is an opportunity that should not be missed.”
Oceana is formed by several eNGOs, including The Pew Charitable Trusts, Oak Foundation, Marisla Foundation, Sandler Foundation and Rockefeller Brothers Fund.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here