KEIR Starmer has been taken to task over his decision to make the Winter Fuel Payment means-tested after an SNP MP pointed out previous concerns he had expressed over pensioners heating their homes.
Brendan O’Hara told the Prime Minister at PMQs he had been speaking to pensioners in South Lochaber at the weekend who remain confused as to why Starmer’s government decided to ditch the payment being universal.
The move was apparently made as part of efforts to plug a reported £20 billion black hole left by the previous government.
O’Hara laid out how pensioners had referred to Starmer, saying in the past that he feared what winter would be like for pensioners when he was the leader of the opposition.
READ MORE: The Guardian quits Twitter/X in shock move for UK publishers
The Argyll, Bute and South Lochaber MP said: “I was in South Lochaber at the weekend speaking to pensioners who still cannot understand why the Prime Minister chose to take away their Winter Fuel Payment.
“One of them remembered from just two years ago the then leader of the opposition saying ‘looking ahead to winter is frightening, I have met pensioners who have no idea how they will heat their home’.
“And she asked me to ask you Prime Minister, whatever happened to that guy?”
Starmer responded by saying ditching the payment for all but the poorest pensioners was part of “tough decisions” the Government had to make in the Budget, but still argued pensioners would be better off.
READ MORE: SNP MP Stephen Gethins to make Holyrood 2026 run – and stay at Westminster
As he [O’Hara] knows from previous answers, we’ve taken tough decisions in this budget to deal with the situation that we have faced,” Starmer said.
“Because of that we have stabilised the economy which means we can commit to the triple lock.
“Because of the triple lock pensioners will be better off. I’ll take no lectures from his party about running the economy. Their record in Scotland is terrible.”
The National reported last week how the SNP are “considering” whether to reverse the winter fuel cut.
Public Finance Minister Ivan McKee hinted the Scottish Government could use a funding uplift from Westminster to mitigate the cut.
Previously, the Scottish Government said it would have “no choice” but to replicate the cut in Scotland.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel