TOMMY Robinson has pleaded not guilty to charges under schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act 2000.
The far-right agitator appeared at Westminster Magistrates Court on Wednesday accused of failing to provide the pin to his mobile phone.
The charge is in relation to an incident in Folkestone on Sunday July 28 after officers stopped Robinson under Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act 2000.
The National is told that the case will go to trial in March 2025.
It comes after he was jailed for 18 months last month after admitting contempt of court by repeating false allegations against a Syrian refugee, in breach of an injunction.
The political activist, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, admitted 10 breaches of a High Court order made in 2021 .
Lawyers for the Solicitor General claimed the 41-year-old had been “thumbing his nose at the court” and “undermining” the rule of law, including by publishing a film called Silenced, which contains the libellous allegations, last year.
Barristers for Robinson, who wore a grey suit and white shirt, said it was his “principles that have brought him before the court”.
READ MORE: Four arrests made at London Tommy Robinson march
Passing sentence, Justice Johnson said the breaches of the injunction were not “accidental, negligent or merely reckless” and that the “custodial threshold is amply crossed”.
He said: “It was a planned, deliberate, direct, flagrant breach of the court’s orders.”
He continued: “Nobody is above the law. Nobody can pick and choose which injunctions they obey and those they do not.”
He added: “It is in the interests of the whole community that injunctions are obeyed.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article