RESEACHERS have said they are unable to establish whether higher taxes in Scotland have cut Government revenues.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) said that their experts were not able to say whether increasing tax on higher earners has boosted or cut the money brought in by the Scottish Government – but the organisation has called for a “pause” on any future increases.
Researchers analysed research by HMRC focusing on the Scottish Government’s initial major divergences from UK tax policy beginning in 2018.
They found two UK Government studies on the 2018-19 tax changes, which saw the creation of new tax bands, were inconclusive. The previous financial year, the Scottish Government also brought more people into the higher rate of tax.
Higher taxes may have cost the Scottish Government more than official estimates from the independent Scottish Fiscal Commission, the researchers said.
But in the first study, the IFS said the estimates on the greater than anticipated cost to the Scottish Government of increasing taxes on higher earners contained “wide” margins of errors and meant the SFC had “chosen not to update its assumptions”.
And the other HMRC study the IFS examined showed that while the costs were higher than assumed by the SFC there remained “wide margins of error”.
The think tank also noted that the changes, measured in 2018-19 had happened “surprisingly” rapidly before failing to make any impact the next year. Researchers said meant that “raises the possibility that estimates for both years are picking up some other factor as opposed to the tax changes in Scotland”.
READ MORE: Thousands more moving to Scotland than leaving after income tax raised
The think tank said that the overall evidence pointed to costs “potentially a bit larger than assumed” by the SFC and that the studies suggested “that previous increases in Scotland’s top rate of income tax will have slightly reduced revenues rather than slightly increased them as the SFC’s assumptions imply”.
The IFS study also noted a more recent HMRC study which found that internal migration from the rest of the UK to Scotland had increased in the period where taxes were higher north of the Border.
The report noted: “Wales has seen a similar trend and internal migration statistics suggest that more rural and more affordable areas of England have also seen an inflow of taxpayers and taxable income. So this is not a Scotland-specific trend. But these data do suggest that any migration response to Scotland’s higher taxes was not big enough to offset fully other factors driving inflow of taxpayers – at least up to around two and a half years ago.”
International evidence, of better quality, suggests that people will move to lower-tax parts of countries, such as Switzerland, the USA and Spain.
David Phillips, an associate director at IFS and head of devolved and local government finance, said both domestic and international research showed that tax rates affected behaviour like how much money people earn, whether they chose to migrate, and whether they chose to evade or avoid tax.
He added: “These responses are most significant for the highest-income individuals who, while few in number, contribute a large share of overall tax revenue. As a result, increases in the top rate of tax are unlikely to raise much – with evidence from the first of Scotland’s reforms in 2018–19 suggesting they may even reduce revenue.
“There is still considerable uncertainty about this though. The bigger changes to income tax seen over the last two years – which have yet to be analysed – will provide a useful opportunity to learn more about taxpayers’ behaviour.
“In the meantime, the evidence currently available suggests that if the aim is to raise revenue, the Scottish Government should at least pause any plans for further increases in Scotland’s tax rates on higher incomes.”
Finance Secretary Shona Robison said the Scottish Government's tax policies were "grounded in evidence".
She said: "The SFC has estimated that our income tax policy choices since devolution will raise an additional £1.5 billion in 2024-25, compared to if we had matched UK Government policy.
“Our tax base continues to grow strongly, with data showing that Scotland experienced faster earnings and tax per head growth than the rest of the UK in both 2022-23 and 2023-24.
"HMRC research also shows that across all tax bands and almost all age ranges in 2021-22, more taxpayers chose Scotland as their home than left – offering yet more proof that Scotland is an attractive place for people to live and work, while our progressive approach to income tax asks those who earn more to contribute some more.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel