SCOTLAND'S social care minister Maree Todd has said she is “absolutely committed” to delivering a new National Care Service amid ongoing delays, insisting the status quo is “not acceptable”.
It emerged yesterday that Todd sent a letter to Holyrood’s Health Committee on Wednesday evening, confirming stage two of the bill will no longer start on November 26, as was previously planned.
Instead, she said a new timetable for the National Care Service (Scotland) Bill will be agreed in the new year.
The move came after unions working in the care sector and local government body Cosla withdrew their support for the bill – which is also opposed by all opposition parties at Holyrood.
Todd was asked whether it was time to scrap the bill altogether on BBC Radio Scotland’s Good Morning Scotland programme on Friday morning.
READ MORE: US Navy to base spy aircraft in Scotland for first time since Cold War
She replied: “We are absolutely committed to delivering the National Care Service.
“The bill team have heard from thousands of people over the last few years who are really struggling to access social care in this country.
“Derek Feeley’s review of adult social care was very clear in what it recommended. He was absolutely certain that we needed to establish a National Care Service underpinned by a human rights based approach and giving a voice to people with lived experience at every level.”
Todd went on to say she was “well aware” of the level of opposition to the Bill from bodies such as Cosla but insisted it was important to continue with the legislation to assist those struggling to access social care.
She continued: “We are absolutely clear that the status quo is not acceptable, we need to change the way we deliver social care in Scotland and we will reflect on what we have heard over the last few months.
“That’s why we have asked Parliament for a pause on the legislation and we will regroup and find a way forward.”
Pressed on whether she could give a guarantee the existing bill would not end up being scrapped in the new year, Todd would only say all parties at Holyrood needed to “put our politics aside” and put their “shoulder to the wheel” in delivering change.
She added: “I have worked really hard with stakeholders right across the board to develop a proposal that everybody agreed with.
“I thought last year when we made an agreement with Cosla we made an agreement on tripartite, shared accountability between ourselves as ministers, local authorities and the NHS.
“We worked intensively over the last year and a half on that agreement and had agreed, probably, over 90% of it.
“It was with great disappointment that I found myself in the situation that they unilaterally withdrew support.
“They had asked for a pause in negotiations over the course of the summer because they found themselves with capacity challenges in terms of their ability to focus on the challenge of delayed discharges and to work out detail with the legislation.
“At the end of the summer, Cosla leaders made a decision to withdraw support from the bill without coming back to the table and without hearing from the voices of lived experience.”
Asked if she was blaming Cosla for the delay in the bill, Todd replied: “I think we need to set aside blame. I think we need to listen to the voices of lived experience who are appealing to all of us who have a role in this … to work together for the good of our citizens and that is what I’m trying to do.”
Earlier on the programme, Scottish Conservative party chairman Craig Hoy branded the National Care Service plan as a “huge power grab on councils”.
He claimed the the Scottish Government had “completely and utterly botched” the introduction of the bill.
“What the Scottish Government has done is spend the last three years with a deeply flawed concept which has now lost support right across Scotland,” he said.
“We warned them at the outset that this was what was going to happen and, yet again, the SNP Government didn’t listen.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel