NIGEL Farage is more popular than Keir Starmer and other UK political party leaders, a poll has suggested.
According to an Ipsos poll carried out between November 8 and 11, the Reform UK leader had the highest favourability rating (28%) in a survey which included Starmer, LibDem leader Ed Davey, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch, Chancellor Rachel Reeves and the Green Party co-leaders Carla Denyer and Adrian Ramsay.
Just 23% regarded Starmer favourably – down 3% from October – while more than half said they didn’t like him as a politician, leaving his net favourability at -29.
Reeves’s rating was even worse, standing at a measly 18%, with 50% regarding her as unfavourable, leaving her net favourability rating at -32.
READ MORE: Stephen Flynn addresses SNP 'anger' over Holyrood bid
Farage’s ability to split public opinion was, however, evident with a substantial 48% regarding him as an unfavourable leader, leaving his net favourability at -20 – worse than Davey and Badenoch, but much better than Starmer and Reeves.
Keiran Pedley, director of UK politics at Ipso, said what the statistics showed overall is that politicians are extremely unpopular overall at the moment with not a single UK leader anywhere near having a positive net favourability rating.
He said: “These numbers show that politicians are not a popular bunch in Britain right now, with more Britons holding unfavourable opinions than favourable for all of the ones on our list.
“Nigel Farage has the highest proportion favourable overall, but it remains to be seen whether he can convert that into increased support for Reform UK moving forward.”
The poll also showed only a quarter of people in the UK view US president-elect Donald Trump favourably while a significant majority (58%) do not like him, resulting in a net rating of -34.
A majority of Reform UK voters (59%) hold a favourable opinion of Trump.
Ipsos interviewed a representative sample of 1139 adults aged 18 and over across the UK.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel