KATE Forbes has said that there is a “credible path” forward for Scottish independence.
Speaking at an event in London organised by the Institute for Government, the Deputy First Minister said it was a “battle of vision for Scotland” between pro-independence and Unionist parties and supporters.
“Yes, there is a credible path forward,” she said.
“The two points I would make in that regard is that irrespective of what happened to the SNP in the most recent election, support for independence has largely remained resilient.” she said.
READ MORE: Scottish Labour support plummets in major new poll
“That illustrates, I think, that a significant component of the Scottish public continues to support independence.”
A recent poll, carried out by FindOutNow on behalf of the Alba Party, found 52% of people supported Yes and 48% said they would vote to remain in the Union with “don’t knows” removed.
A separate survey by The Sunday Times – carried out by Norstat (formerly known as Panelbase) – also found support for independence in a slight lead at 47.4% against No on 46.9%.
Forbes said that the opportunity – given that support remains “resilient” – is to “try and increase those figures by illustrating a compelling vision for Scotland's future” as an independent country.
She added: “And I think what's fascinating is that people voted for change in the last election.
“And if you look at some of the polling figures, [support for] Scottish Labour had fallen by seven points – suggesting that they would return 29 MSPs and the SNP would return 51.”
Forbes went on: “The constitution remains live. The constitution remains important. And it is really a battle of vision for Scotland.”
At the London event, the MSP for Skye, Lochaber and Badenoch also highlighted the importance of a rural visa scheme for parts of Scotland suffering from depopulation – and called on the UK Government to take action.
“We have been working and put to the UK Government a pilot rural workers visa,” she said.
“That is sitting on the desk of the new UK Government. There's been some different messaging coming in terms of their support or not for a Scottish visa.
“So, these are the things where we will be able to test that relationship in terms of whether they are willing to do things that are distinctive and that meet a need in the Scottish economy.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel