RACHEL Reeves has been challenged to make her employment history clear amid growing allegations that she lied on her CV.
The Chancellor has been facing pressure after she quietly changed her LinkedIn profile to remove a reference to having worked as an economist at Halifax Bank of Scotland (HBOS). This was also a claim she made during the 2010 General Election, when she told voters she had worked “as an economist … at Halifax Bank of Scotland”.
However, her LinkedIn profile now states that, from 2006-2009, Reeves worked in retail banking for HBOS. The Times reported that she had been “running a small administrative complaints department that also dealt with IT matters”.
READ MORE: Kelly Given: Rachel Reeves is no feminist hero – she’s the same as the rest
Newspapers reports over the weekend further contested Reeves’s claim in an interview with Stylist magazine from 2021 that she had spent a decade at the Bank of England. Reeves’s LinkedIn says this was in fact a six-year period, between 2000 and 2006.
Between 2003-2004, Reeves was also studying for a master’s degree at the London School of Economics, and she was just 27 when she left the Bank of England in 2006, suggesting all her roles were junior positions.
The Conservatives accused Reeves of telling "brazen" lies.
Former Tory chair Richard Holden has now pressured Reeves to make clear her exact work history, saying that allegations of having lied on her CV are “not trivial matters — and leave serious questions”.
The MP wrote: “As you know standards in public life are upheld by rigorous accountability and transparency – which is why I write to you seeking clarity.
“This is equally important as many businesses and working people already feel as if Labour had not been honest with them … I would therefore be grateful for a prompt answer to the following questions:
- 1. Between what years were you employed by the Bank of England?
- 2. What was your job title at the Bank of England?
- 3. Between what years were you employed by HBOS?
- 4. What was your job title at HBOS?
- 5. What was the reason you left HBOS?
- 6. Will you now publish a full, unedited CV?
“The allegations that your CV might not be accurate are incredibly serious and would raise significant concerns about your ability to be honest with the British public, concerns which your Budget has already raised.”
On Monday, No 10 defended Reeves’s record in office.
“The Prime Minister is very clear that the Chancellor has restored financial stability,” a spokesperson said.
They went on: “This is someone who on coming into office looked under the bonnet and exposed a £22 billion black hole in the public finances, and has been straight with the public about what is necessary to balance the books and restore financial stability in the face of that.”
The Treasury has been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel