SCOTS are among the best in the UK at spotting fake accents, with those in the south of England the worst, according to a new study.
In a test by the University of Cambridge, people from Glasgow, Belfast, Dublin, and the north east of England performed better at detecting a person's accent, real or imitated, than those from the south of England.
Around 50 people were recruited from regions across the UK.
Experts then recorded participants repeating sentences in their own accent, including ‘‘Hold up those two cooked tea bags”; “She kicked the goose hard with her foot”; “He thought a bath would make him happy”; “Jenny told him to face up to his weight”; and, “Kit strutted across the room”.
Participants were then asked to imitate six other accents they did not naturally speak and asked to determine which accents were authentic.
READ MORE: Scots pick independence as top choice for constitutional change – poll
The findings, published in a study in the journal Evolutionary Human Sciences, argue strong cultural identities in areas which performed better may mean residents keep an eye out for outsiders and are alert to other cultures.
Study co-author and University of Cambridge postdoctoral researcher Jonathan R. Goodman said: “Cultural, political, or even violent conflict are likely to encourage people to strengthen their accents as they try to maintain social cohesion through cultural homogeneity.
“Even relatively mild tension, for example the intrusion of tourists in the summer, could have this effect.”
“We found a pretty pronounced difference in accent cheater detection between these areas.
“We think that the ability to detect fake accents is linked to an area’s cultural homogeneity, the degree to which its people hold similar cultural values.”
He added: “The UK is a really interesting place to study. The linguistic diversity and cultural history is so rich and you have so many cultural groups that have been roughly in the same location for a really long time.
“Very specific differences in language, dialect and accents have emerged over time, and that’s a fascinating side of language evolution.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel