BEING an MP and MSP at the same time is “not sustainable”, an SNP minister has said.
Appearing on BBC Radio Scotland on Thursday morning, Public Finance Minister Ivan McKee said he did not believe that it was possible to give both parliaments “due attention”.
The discussion around “double-jobbing” was sparked after SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn announced his intention to stand for Holyrood in the 2026 elections without resigning his seat as an MP.
Flynn’s announcement of his intention to run for the Scottish Parliament was quickly followed by two other MPs, Dave Doogan and Stephen Gethins, saying they had also submitted nomination papers for 2026.
READ MORE: Kelly Given: Stephen Flynn's boys club will elbow women aside for their ambition
In the 2021 Holyrood elections, the SNP’s National Executive Committee (NEC) blocked MPs from standing unless they first resigned their Westminster seats. However, that rule has since been described as “election specific” and there is uncertainty around whether the NEC will re-impose it for 2026.
The Times reported one SNP source as claiming there was “definitely a clear majority on the NEC against a dual mandate” – although The National has been told it is less clear cut and that a decision will be made in due course.
The BBC asked McKee about the reports in The Times, to which the minister replied that he was “not party to those [the NEC’s] discussions”.
Asked if he thought “double-jobbing” should be banned, McKee said: “I think that double-jobbing, working as an MP and MSP, isn't sustainable. I've got a full-time job as an MSP and a minister.
“I gave up work that I had – consultancy and directorship work that I had, that was paid work I didn't need to give up – when I came into government, when I came into parliament, because I recognised that this was a full-time job and it's a full-time commitment.
“So I think trying to be an MSP and an MP at the same time isn't sustainable.”
Asked if he would like to see Flynn quit Westminster before running for Holyrood, he said: “I think Stephen’s got huge talent. He's got a lot to offer to the party and the country in the years to come.
“I think that we do know that the SNP is probably the most democratic party, one of the most democratic parties, in terms of members can stand to challenge sitting MSPs and that applies to all of us, and there was quite a number of those challenges in the last cycle, and that's to be welcomed.”
He said that Flynn therefore had the right to try and stand for Holyrood, but added: “As I said, I think the idea that you can do both those jobs and give them due attention is not sustainable.”
READ MORE: 'I would have acted differently': Audrey Nicoll on Stephen Flynn's Holyrood bid
Flynn has made clear his intention to run for Holyrood in the Aberdeen South and North Kincardine constituency, which is held by SNP MSP Audrey Nicoll.
On Wednesday, her fellow SNP MSP Evelyn Tweed appeared to raise the issue at a Holyrood committee hearing.
Tweed asked the SNP's local government and campaigns officer Cailyn McMahon: "If, and I know this is quite specific to our party, but if somebody came in on an all-woman list and is a sitting MSP and is very competent, very strong, doing a good job, will there be any protections in place from a male person coming in to challenge her?"
McMahon said it was “absolutely a valid point and this is something we should prioritise”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel