JOHN Swinney has slammed Russell Findlay over a “£950m gaping hole” in his party’s tax cut proposals.
Speaking at First Minister’s Questions (FMQs), the FM was challenged on an Audit Scotland report which urged ministers to “set out a clearer vision” for the future by the Scottish Conservative leader on Thursday.
Findlay said: “Under the SNP there’s no leadership, no transparency, no answers, just broken promises, pathetic excuses and making it up as they go along.”
But the First Minister said the Scottish Tory leader may be “in a slightly stronger position to argue for his case” had he not been in favour of the unfunded tax cuts of former prime minister Liz Truss – including urging the Scottish Government to do the same.
READ MORE: Westminster committee launches inquiry into Scottish Government funding
“If I’d followed the example of Liz Truss, we would have acute problems in the balancing of our budget this year,” Swinney said.
“Thank goodness I never inflicted that on Scotland.”
The First Minister then turned to a letter he received this week from Findlay, setting out the Tories’ asks for a Budget deal.
NEW: John Swinney has said the Tories have presented £1 billion of tax cuts for the upcoming Scottish Budget - with a £950m 'gaping hole'
— The National (@ScotNational) November 21, 2024
🗣'Don't you dare come here and lecture me about the public finances' pic.twitter.com/EAdgU3ld08
The letter urged Swinney to scrap the 20p and 21p rate of tax, as well as implement rates relief for leisure, hospitality and tourism businesses that would see restaurants and pubs pay nothing at all, and increase the threshold for land and buildings transaction tax (LBTT) from £145,001 to £250,000.
Addressing the letter, Swinney said: “Russell Findlay argued for a tax cut that would cost, in his estimation, not mine, £1 billion – a thousand million pounds.
“On the other side, Mr Findlay gave me a paragraph of the savings that will be delivered to achieve his one thousand million pound tax cut, and those savings amount to a grand total of £53.74 million.
“So there’s a £950 million gaping hole in Mr Findlay’s arguments to me this week.
“Don’t dare come here and lecture me about the public finances with the ineptitude that you’ve put forward in your letter to me this week.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel