THE “appalling” cost of the coronation of King Charles III has been revealed by the UK Government.
Official accounts have revealed the coronation cost taxpayers £72 million although anti-monarchy group Republic believes the real cost was in fact much more.
The figures included £50.3m of Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) costs as well as £21.7m for the Home Office for policing the event in May 2023.
READ MORE: Scottish Labour hold three seats in Glasgow by-elections
Charles (below) was crowned at Westminster Abbey in a ceremony attended by dignitaries from across the world while a concert also took place the following night at Windsor Castle.
Speaking to The Guardian, Republic CEO Graham Smith said: “I would be very surprised if £72m was the whole cost.
“But even that kind of money - £72m – is incredible.”
Smith was part of a group which was arrested at an anti-monarchy protest on the day of the coronation – with the Met Police later saying it “regretted that those six arrested were unable to join the wider group of protesters in Trafalgar Square”.
The campaigner added: “It’s a huge amount of money to spend on one person’s parade when there was no obligation whatsoever in the constitution or in law to have a coronation, and when we were facing cuts to essential services.
“It was a parade that Charles insisted on at huge expense to the taxpayer, and this is on top of the huge inheritance tax bill he didn’t (have to) pay, on top of the £500m-a-year cost of the monarchy.
“It was an extravagance we simply didn’t have to have. It was completely unnecessary and a waste of money in the middle of a cost of living crisis in a country that is facing huge amounts of child poverty.
“When kids are unable to afford lunches at school, to spend over £70m on this parade is obscene.”
DCMS was the lead government department working with the royal household on the coronation, which it described as a “once-in-a-generation moment which provided an occasion for the entire country to come together in celebration”.
It said it “offered a unique opportunity to celebrate and strengthen our national identity and showcase the UK to the world”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel