THE UK Home Secretary has refused to say whether she supports the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) arrest warrant for Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Yvette Cooper was grilled by LBC presenter Nick Ferrari after the ICC issued arrest warrants for Netanyahu and former Israeli defence minister Yoav Gallant, as well as Hamas commander Mohammed Deif – who Israel claim was killed in July.
The arrest warrants mean that the UK Government is legally obliged to arrest Netanyahu if he sets foot on British soil. The Rome Statute from which this obligation springs was incorporated into UK domestic law with the International Criminal Court Act 2001.
Cooper was asked whether Netanyahu would be arrested if he were to land in the UK.
READ MORE: Benjamin Netanyahu calls ICC 'antisemitic' after arrest warrant issued
She immediately responded: “So that’s not a matter for me as Home Secretary.”
Ferrari expressed shock at this answer before Cooper said there was a “proper process” for the UK Government to go through if ICC cases “do ever become a matter for the UK”.
However, she did not at any point specify what that process was.
Cooper said: “There’s a proper process, Nick, and I’ll just say something about that.
“So with the International Criminal Court cases, obviously that is independent and we respect their independence, and the vast majority never become issues for the UK legal process, law enforcement processes, or for the UK Government.
'Would Benjamin Netanyahu be arrested if he landed in the UK?'
— LBC (@LBC) November 22, 2024
'That's not a matter for me.'
'What? You're the Home Secretary!'
Yvette Cooper is reluctant to share with @NickFerrariLBC whether she supports the ICC's arrest warrant for the Israeli Prime Minister. pic.twitter.com/yrjprfSfwc
“If cases do ever become a matter for the UK, then there is a proper legal process that has to be followed. There’s a proper Government process, including the Foreign Office process, that has to be followed, and therefore it’s not appropriate for me to comment on any individual case as Home Secretary.”
Asked to clarify her personal view on the matter, she said: “I totally understand why you are asking me that question but you I know will also understand why as Home Secretary I cannot comment on speculative legal processes because it’s important that they are properly followed.”
READ MORE: Keir Starmer told to apologise for 'condoning Israeli war crimes'
The processes to which Cooper refers are spelled out in the 2001 ICC Act.
The act states that if a UK "judicial officer is satisfied that the warrant appears to have been issued by the ICC, he shall endorse the warrant for execution in the United Kingdom".
The UK Government put out a statement on Thursday evening following the warrants being issued which said it respected the independence of the court, adding that Israel “has a right to defend itself in accordance with international law”.
It went on: “There is no moral equivalence between Israel, a democracy, and Hamas and Lebanese Hizballah, which are terrorist organisations.
“We remain focused on pushing for an immediate ceasefire, to bring an end to the devastating violence in Gaza.
“This is essential to protect civilians, ensure the release of hostages and to increase humanitarian aid into Gaza.”
Prime Minister Keir Starmer is facing calls to apologise for “condoning” Israel’s actions in Gaza, which experts say amount to genocide – although an official ruling on that has not yet come from the International Court of Justice.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel