KEIR Starmer has been condemned over a “problematic” tweet where he described a meeting with the controversial firm BlackRock.
“I'm determined to deliver growth, create wealth and put more money in people’s pockets,” the Prime Minister wrote yesterday.
“This can only be achieved by working in partnership with leading businesses, like BlackRock, to capitalise on the UK’s position as a world leading hub for investment.”
BlackRock is the world’s biggest asset management company and has been criticised for investing in fossil fuel companies, the arms industry, and human rights violations in China.
READ MORE: Police record an increase in domestic abuse incidents in Scotland
Just two days ago, it faced a complaint at the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) for allegedly contributing to environmental and human rights abuses around the world through its investments in agribusiness – including accusations of increasing investments in companies that have been implicated in the devastation of the Amazon.
And in June, the UN called on BlackRock to divest from firms arming Israel, warning of "repercussions for complicity in potential atrocity crimes". The investment firm did nothing.
Starmer's meeting was swiftly condemned, including by Labour MP Clive Lewis and Dr Kirsty Hughes – the founder of the Scottish Centre on European Relations.
Hughes said: “Government as only a gung ho inward investment agency without even basic principles for that investment: roll up China, roll up Blackrock – you'll solve all our problems.”
Lewis said the Twitter/X post was “problematic” for a number of reasons.
This post is problematic for a number of reasons.
— Clive Lewis MP (@labourlewis) November 21, 2024
A thread…🧵
1. For those attempting to make sense of Trump’s victory and the rise of the far-right across Europe - look no further than the PMs statement below.
Whether you like it or not, the far-right has a set of common… https://t.co/lDpz8B9Ppz
“For those attempting to make sense of Trump’s victory and the rise of the far-right across Europe – look no further than the Prime minister’s statement below,” he wrote.
“Whether you like it or not, the far-right has a set of common narratives. We can probably all recite them.
"Something like, ‘the reason you’re in an overpriced, damp rental; your gran lives in squalor; your job is low paid/insecure and your public services are crumbling – is because elites declared war on workers, favoured immigrants and made your life more expensive with their ‘green crap’.
“‘Vote for us and we will deport the immigrants, stop the elites, cut the green crap and declare war on woke, Britain will be great again’.”
The Labour MP then went on to say that Labour’s “story”, just like that of the Democratic Party in the United States, “doesn’t make narrative sense”.
“Rather than explain how 40 years of atomising, neoliberal plunder; the selling-off of and destruction of our public services; the undermining or our democracy, the hollowing out and selling off of our natural resources at the hands of companies like Blackrock and other price-gouging corporations, billionaires & financial institutions, has led us here,” he said.
“Instead we refuse to give a credible explanation for how we got here other than ‘it was Tory chaos’. Problem is, when the political and economic permacrisis continues, that won’t be a viable explanation. By refusing to identify who the culprits for this state of affairs is, we fail to make a convincing narrative story that explains our predicament. Instead we become the defenders of the very elites – the business as usual brigade – that the right claim we are.”
The full post on LinkedIn is even more gushing https://t.co/M580ddF3rn pic.twitter.com/yNLCCQnaNE
— Ethan Shone (@EJShone93) November 22, 2024
Investigative journalist Ethan Shone, meanwhile, said the post on LinkedIn was “even more gushing”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel