KEIR Starmer has been condemned for his continued silence on the International Criminal Court issuing an arrest warrant for Benjamin Netanyahu.
The ICC’s ruling that there are reasonable grounds on which to arrest the Israeli leader – as well as former Israeli defence minister Yoav Gallant and Hamas commander Mohammed Deif – for war crimes and crimes against humanity has led to immense pressure on the Labour Government, which is still supplying Israel with arms.
The arrest warrants mean that the UK Government is legally obliged to arrest Netanyahu if he sets foot on British soil – with the Rome Statute from which this obligation springs incorporated into UK domestic law with the International Criminal Court Act 2001.
READ MORE: Full list of countries that must arrest Netanyahu amid ICC warrant
But the Prime Minister and Foreign Secretary David Lammy have remained totally silent on the matter. since the announcement yesterday at noon.
A UK Government statement has since said it “respected the independence” of the ICC but didn’t specify whether the arrest warrant would be complied with if Netanyahu stepped foot on UK soil – a clarification that Home Secretary Yvette Cooper also refused to answer in interviews on Friday.
The Prime Minister’s official spokesman also said the ICC, based in The Hague, Netherlands, is “the primary international institution for investigating and prosecuting the most serious crimes of international concern”.
But the spokesman also declined to get into “hypotheticals” when asked on Thursday whether Netanyahu would be arrested if he came to the UK.
Now, Starmer’s silence has been called out with Scottish Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie (above) hitting out at the Prime Minister for “moral evasion” and “willing ignorance”.
"The UK Government's response to the announcement entirely fails to give the clarity that’s needed. Any country that respects international law must explicitly commit to respecting yesterday’s decision, and to enforce the arrest warrant,” Harvie said.
"Instead we’re seeing moral evasion and willing ignorance from Keir Starmer and his Government. He is meant to be a human rights lawyer but he has chosen to arm and support a genocide that is being inflicted in plain view and is being done with UK-made weapons.”
The Labour Government previously faced criticism for suspending just 30 out of 350 arms export licences to Israel – not including the licence for F-35 jet parts.
The Scottish Greens co-leader also highlighted that when the ICC issued an arrest warrant for Vladimir Putin, Starmer was among those calling for the Russian president to face justice.
“But this time he has completely failed to live up to the values he professes to hold,” he said.
"If the Prime Minister and his Cabinet have any interest whatsoever in the rights and lives of Palestinians then they must stop the arms sales, end their complicity in some of the gravest war crimes of our age, and respect the verdict of International Criminal Court by making clear that Netanyahu and other war criminals will be arrested if they set foot in the UK.”
It’s been 24 hours & neither @Keir_Starmer nor @DavidLammy have commented on the ICC’s decision to issue arrest warrants for Benjamin Netanyahu & Yoav Gallant for war crimes & crimes against humanity.
— Zarah Sultana MP (@zarahsultana) November 22, 2024
Perhaps they could apply the same standards as the ones they outlined below: pic.twitter.com/lEIPUkmOQv
Suspended Labour MP Zarah Sultana (above) also hit out at the continued silence.
“It’s been 24 hours and neither Keir Starmer nor David Lammy have commented on the ICC’s decision to issue arrest warrants for Benjamin Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant for war crimes and crimes against humanity.”
She added: “Perhaps they could apply the same standards as the ones they outlined below.”
SNP MSP and former first minister Humza Yousaf also highlighted the continued silence.
"Astonishingly, 24 hours after the ICC issued a number of arrest warrants, there has not been a peep from the Prime Minister or Foreign Secretary on this issue."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel