ALEX Cole-Hamilton has said his party will vote down the upcoming Budget if it contains even a “penny” promoting Scottish independence.
The minority SNP administration needs MSPs from at least one opposition party to either back or abstain in the vote on its spending plans in order to get them passed.
The LibDem leader confirmed talks had taken place about the price of his party’s support – believed to include a £140 million ferry deal – but made it clear they would actively vote against any spending plans that promoted independence.
Finance Secretary Shona Robison (below) will deliver the Scottish Government's Budget at Holyrood on December 4.
Speaking to the BBC Scotland's Sunday Show, Cole-Hamilton said the public had sent the SNP a "clear message" in the recent General Election that they are "done with the constitution".
He said: "I don’t see a circumstance where any Liberal Democrat could vote for a Budget that is clearly spending money on the constitution.
READ MORE: Labour pledge to cut 'bulging benefits bill' to 'get Britain working'
"I think that would be a massive misuse of public funds no matter how small.
"We need every penny available spent on our schools, on our GP surgeries, on the mental health crisis."
Cole-Hamilton (below) added: "The SNP will have to go a long way to persuade us, that whilst they might delete things like any independence spending from their budget that they won’t just go back to their old ways of spending any political oxygen on the constitution.”
Asked by host Martin Geissler about whether LibDem MSPs might abstain, which would allow the Budget to pass despite containing money promoting independence, he said he would vote it down and "that is where we would be".
Meanwhile, the Scottish Greens have said they will only back the Budget if no cuts to independence spending are made.
We told how the Tories have demanded almost £1 billion in tax cuts from the Budget, although party leader Russell Findlay conceded that the plans were “unlikely” to be accepted.
The SNP have been contacted for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel