THE rector of the University of Glasgow has warned the institution that it is “complicit in the crimes of this century” after management refused to divest from arms firms linked to Israel.
The Scottish institution’s ruling court drew anger from staff and students last week after it ignored an overwhelming majority and ruled that it would continue investing in weapons companies.
An email sent to staff and shared with The National by multiple sources said that bosses had considered “that the University’s endowment fund should disinvest completely in companies that earn more than 10% of their income from the defence sector”.
It noted that "this view was backed by a clear majority of staff and students who responded to the consultation exercise" – 81% of staff and 86% of students.
But the email went on: “However, court accepted the advice of senior managers that the university should not require fund managers to disinvest.”
It said the decision was due to the university’s connection with arms firms.
Now, Ghassan Abu-Sittah, the renowned Palestinian surgeon who was elected Glasgow University rector by a resounding majority of students earlier this year, has spoken out.
He went on: “British arms manufacturers, as a result of the failure of this Government – like the previous government – to impose meaningful arms embargoes, continue to be a provider of the weapons by which these war crimes are being committed.
“Glasgow University has missed a unique opportunity to cut its ties with these manufacturers and therefore reduce its liability as being complicit in the crimes of this century.”
Abu-Sittah is an alumnus of Glasgow University and a world-leading expert on war-injured patients and children. He has worked in Iraq, Yemen, Syria and Palestine as well as Beirut, where he set up a programme providing free cleft care for refugee children, a discipline he learned training at Great Ormond Street Children's Hospital in London.
READ MORE: Read new University of Glasgow rector's powerful first address on Gaza in full
He told The National: “Currently, I am treating the war-wounded in Lebanon.
“These war-wounded, many of whom are children, have been wounded by weapons delivered by British arms manufacturers to Israel during the genocide so that they can be used in the war in Lebanon.
“These manufacturers are part-owned by Glasgow University and the failure of the university to cut its ties and divest means that it is prepared to continue to become complicit in these crimes.”
The controversial endowment fund was worth a total of £262 million at the end of July 2024.
READ MORE: Arrest warrants issued for Benjamin Netanyahu and ex-Israel defence secretary
A publicly available list of investments from 2023 includes shares in weapons firms linked to Israel such as BAE Systems, Lockheed Martin and Thales. Analysis of the list suggests that the total sum of shares in defence companies held by the University of Glasgow is £3.1m.
However, it is hard to know exactly what funding sits where. For example, firms like Boeing manufacture both missiles and commercial jets.
Sources within the university told The National they were “disgusted”, and questioned why Glasgow University would not divest “such a small amount of money, when you look at their entire investment portfolio”.
Asked for comment, the University of Glasgow directed this paper to the statement issued last week to staff.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here