THE UK Government could be forced into an immediate ban on arms sales to Israel after human rights campaigners issued an ultimatum to Westminster lawyers.
The Global Legal Action Network (GLAN) and the Palestinian activist group Al-Haq have given UK Government lawyers until the end of this week to review Labour’s partial arms ban – or face the threat of an immediate embargo.
The organisations said if they did not receive a response by 4pm on Friday, they would seek an emergency injunction at the High Court.
If granted, this would see the UK Government legally ordered to stop selling arms to Israel for a period.
GLAN and Al-Haq argued that the issue of international arrest warrants for Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu (above) and his former defence minister Yoav Gallant had changed the circumstances of their first challenge against the UK Government.
Labour earlier this year announced a partial ban on arms sales to Israel – with the major exemption of parts for F-35 fighter jets, which are used to bomb Gaza.
READ MORE: Sky News host Kay Burley fumes after Elon Musk weighs in on General Election petition
GLAN and Al-Haq argued that the UK Government has “acknowledged” it would be required to arrest Netanyahu and Gallant if they were to enter Britain, per the International Criminal Court’s arrest warrants.
They added: “It is irrational that the UK should continue to export arms to persons whom the Government accepts it is required to arrest.”
Charlotte Andrews-Briscoe, a lawyer with GLAN, said: “It is unconscionable that the UK continues to allow British-made components for F-35s to be used in Israel’s extermination campaign against Palestinians.”
“A two-way arms embargo on Israel should be implemented immediately, to prevent British arms being used by indicted war criminals for further serious violations against Palestinians.”
A Foreign Office spokesperson said: “We have suspended relevant export licences to Israel for use in military operations in the Gaza conflict, following a review into Israel’s compliance with international humanitarian law which concluded there is a clear risk that UK export items might be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of international humanitarian law.
“We would not comment on ongoing or potential future legal proceedings.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel