THE Scottish Government intends to fully dual the A96, the Transport Secretary has told MSPs.
However, Fiona Hyslop said in the Holyrood chamber that it would not be possible by 2030 – which had previously been pledged.
Hyslop said that a review conducted by Transport Scotland, which was published on Thursday after being created due to the ruling agreement with the Greens, would now be opened to public consultation.
The A96 runs from Inverness to Aberdeen. The SNP first pledged to dual the road in their 2011 Holyrood manifesto.
The review recommended not dualling the road. Although that was seen as the safest option, it was considered worse in eight other assessed areas, and equal in four.
The cost of full dualling east of Nairn to Aberdeen was estimated in the range of £2.5 billion to £5bn, which compares with a range of £501m to £1bn for the refined package.
Transport Scotland said: “That is why, along with its performance in relation to the assessment criteria, the appraisal has identified that the refined package of options is the optimal one.”
Hyslop told MSPs that, while the Scottish Government favours fully dualling the A96 road, it may ultimately decide to take another path.
The SNP minister said that “no final decision has been made”.
Inverness and Nairn SNP MSP Fergus Ewing accused ministers of “betraying” locals who use the road.
Hyslop told Holyrood: “The Scottish Government’s current plan is to fully duel the A96 between Inverness and Aberdeen.
“As part of this process, Transport Scotland has been undertaking a transparent, evidence-based review.”
Hyslop was interrupted by Douglas Ross, who accused her of deliberately misleading Parliament and said the government is “backsliding” on its commitment.
The Transport Secretary went on: “The Scottish Government currently favours fully dualling the A96 between Inverness and Aberdeen.
“The A96 corridor review evidence suggests that there may be a different approach to provide alternative solutions at a more cost-effective, affordable budget.
“It is important that we gather the public’s views before making a final decision on the programme. So today, we are also launching a 12-week consultation on outcomes of the review.
“This will provide people, businesses and organisations with the opportunity to fully consider the findings from the detailed work that has been undertaken by Transport Scotland.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel