FORMER Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross was admonished in the Holyrood chamber after he interrupted an SNP minister claiming she had “deliberately” misled Parliament.
Ross intervened on Transport Secretary Fiona Hyslop – despite MSPs having been explicitly told not to do so – as she delivered an update on the dualling of the A96.
The Tory MSP stepped in after Hyslop said that the “Scottish Government's current plan is to fully dual the A96 between Inverness and Aberdeen”.
This came despite a Transport Scotland review, published earlier on Thursday, recommending instead that the road is given targeted improvements, such as bypasses.
Waving the review in the air, Ross accused Hyslop of lying.
He said: “I'm sorry, presiding officer, and I wouldn't normally do this, but can you see if it's in order for the Transport Secretary to deliberately mislead this parliament?
“Because anyone who has read this document [the review] knows that this SNP Government is no longer committed to fully dualling the A96.
“Whatever the Cabinet Secretary is saying today, it is not the truth because this document says they are backsliding on their commitment, and they are not going to fully dual that road.”
Deputy presiding officer Annabelle Ewing asked Ross to withdraw his remarks and highlighted that Hyslop was in the middle of her statement.
“I will simply do it because I want to ask a question,” Ross responded.
He was later admonished as he continued to talk from the backbenches.
Interrupting Hyslop to talk to Tory MSPs, Ewing said: “I will not have a running commentary.
“I made it quite clear at the beginning that the statement would be made without interventions or interruptions, and I expect that my statement in that regard will be heeded.”
Hyslop went on to tell MSPs that, although the SNP Government wanted to see the A96 dualled, it would not be done before 2030.
She further said that the Transport Scotland review would inform a future decision after a public consultation.
The SNP minister told MSPs that no final decision on dualling the A96 had yet been made.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel