A PLANNING application for a phone mast in the Cairngorms has been withdrawn amid numerous objections.
Action to Protect Rural Scotland (APRS) welcomed the withdrawal, having previously objected to the proposed location, which was 400 meters from Ryovan Bothy and situated in a remote area of the national park.
The proposed location was a popular hill for hikers and mountaineers and an important habitat for capercaillie, a red-listed bird, or other rare species.
The proposed location was also on the ground of the Abernethy Forest Special Protection Area (SPA) designated for capercaillie and osprey, the Cairngorms SAC designated for freshwater and upland habitats, and the Cairngorms Massif SPA designated for golden eagle.
The RSPB feared the “adverse effects on capercaillie, which is one of the species for which Abernethy Forest SPA and Cairngorms SPA are protected".
RSPB also pointed to the fact it might have affected the red-throated diver and black grouse.
READ MORE: Phone mast plan for Highland glen ‘shows UK scheme is waste of money’
“As well as being a prime example of Scotland’s upland habitats, Ryvoan has a particular place in the hearts of those who love the mountains,” said Kat Jones, director of APRS.
“Ryvoan bothy has been the starting point for many a mountain adventure and the experience of coming up the path from Glenmore and then out into the expanse of mountains is really special.
"We welcome the withdrawal of this planning application which would have had an unacceptable impact on this special place.”
APRS said that the construction of Ryovan’s phone mast would have “minimal” benefits due to the recent construction of a mast at Lanchoil.
“There are other masts being proposed in remote hill-areas of Scotland to achieve the same hollow targets, which don’t focus on benefit to people and businesses, but rather geographical coverage alone.
"We, with communities and other charities, are calling for a rethink which protects our landscapes and special places,” said Jones.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel