SCOTTISH Labour’s proposals for a replacement to the Winter Fuel Payment have been rejected in a Holyrood vote.
The SNP have a rival plan which would replace the universal benefit, scrapped by Labour in Westminster, set to be included in the Budget this week.
Scottish Labour introduced amendments to the Social Security (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill – in a bid to put pressure on the SNP on the issue.
But the SNP subsequently announced they would push ahead with their own scheme, the Pension Age Winter Heating Payment, next year after its future initially appeared uncertain.
It means they will accuse Scottish Labour of voting against the benefit three times, if they fail to back Wednesday’s Budget, while Anas Sarwar’s troops will accuse the SNP of rejecting their replacement scheme.
READ MORE: Labour must back Budget and restore winter fuel support, say SNP
Amendments to introduce the Scottish scheme was defeated in Holyrood on Tuesday, with MSPs voting against the first by 51 votes to 60. The second was defeated by 50 votes to 67.
Scottish Labour have accused the SNP of playing "petty politics" by refusing to back their amendments.
Paul O'Kane, the party's social security spokesperson, said: "This vote was a chance for the SNP Government to put its own stated policy on legal footing, but it refused."
The SNP's plans will go to a vote when Finance Secretary unveils the Budget on Wednesday.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel