A SCOTTISH council agreed a hike in taxi fares of almost 27% in its latest meeting.
Scottish Borders Council reviews taxi fares every 18 months and must consult with operators and members of the public on any proposals to change the taxi fare tariff.
The council uses a formula which was agreed between the trade, the traffic commissioner and the council to determine variations in taxi rates.
The last review was concluded in August 2019.
A further review was due to be held in 2021, however operational pressures and the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic delayed it.
Discussions with taxi operators have highlighted the financial pressures facing the sector at the moment due to increasing costs and delays associated with the review.
Operators are reporting costs increases of around 144% to their businesses associated with increased operational costs, including insurance, fuel and wages. When members of Scottish Borders Council’s decision-making Executive Committee met on Tuesday, they agreed an increase of 26.7%.
Members also endorsed a rise in the cost of a vehicle valet from £70 to £100.
It is probable the increases will come into force in early February 2025.
READ MORE: Susan Aitken and Anas Sarwar in row over Glasgow by election blunder
Elaine Thornton-Nicol, SNP councillor for Selkirkshire, said: “I know people think taxis are very expensive but it is a privilege, not a right. You don’t have a right to a taxi. It’s not a human right.
“We are now at a stage that we have artificially held quite frequently the levels of increase down. We all know how much fuel has gone up. We do need to put a dramatic increase in there.”
Meanwhile, Tom Weatherston, Conservative councillor for Kelso & District, “reluctantly” supported the huge hike, saying: “I think as a committee we are in a very difficult position today and to coin a phrase we’re stuck between a rock and a hard place.
“I am very aware that taxi operators have been placed in a very difficult position. I spoke to one last night and he’s really struggling and he said without this rise he’ll probably fold.
“On the other hand, I can see the impact this will have on the public using the service, but if you haven’t got a taxi you haven’t got a service anyway, so I’m reluctantly going to support this.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel