LABOUR have done “nothing” to reverse Tory “social murder” policies, according to a leading expert on austerity.
David Walsh, a public health expert at Glasgow University, has said there appears to be a lack of “political will” in Westminster to axe Tory welfare policies he argues reduced life expectancy in the UK.
Walsh was speaking at Strathclyde University on Monday night for the launch of his new book Social Murder? Austerity and Life Expectancy in the UK, co-authored with fellow Glasgow academic Gerry McCartney.
The book argues that policies such as benefit sanctions and cuts resulted in life expectancy falling and death rates increasing in the most deprived parts of the UK.
Walsh (below) said that Glasgow had previously been a “bit of a success story” in improving life expectancy – before the “extraordinary, unprecedented reversal” he said came as a result of punitive policies on benefit claimants.
Austerity “fundamentally changed” the UK, argued Walsh, including the greatly increased use of food banks, which he said had previously been a minor phenomenon.
The book puts forward what Walsh and McCartney said were “evidence-based” solutions to combat falling life expectancy – which boiled down to reversing Tory welfare policies.
READ MORE: Scottish winter fuel debate is 'nuts', says leading think tank director
Walsh said: “We now have a different Government in power, so hopefully maybe things will all just be peachy. Except that the signs aren’t particularly great.
“The most recent Budget suggests maybe a little bit more money for services but in terms of the cuts to social security, which have so hammered the poorest and most vulnerable in society, nothing is being reversed.”
Labour have pledged to get more people off benefits and into work, with Keir Starmer (above) committing to Tory plans to trim the welfare bill by £1.3 billion from the benefits bill annually.
Their plans have been met with warnings from disability campaigners, including the charity Scope which said announcements last month to slash welfare spending would cause “a huge amount of anxiety”.
The UK Government was approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel