CLIMATE campaigners are calling on the Scottish Government to take more decisive action on plastic pollution following the failure of a treaty agreement.
It follows last week's meeting in Busan, South Korea, where 175 governments gathered to discuss the details of the UN's Global Plastics Treaty aimed at ending the plastic pollution crisis.
The meeting ended without any agreement on key issues such as limiting plastic pollution, removing the use of harmful chemicals, and setting up financial help for poorer nations to adapt to the measures discussed.
READ MORE: Nations meet as part of final bid to address global plastic crisis
The fossil fuel and plastic industries, and certain countries that produce large amounts of plastic, were criticised for obstructing, delaying, and undermining efforts to make progress.
Kim Pratt, circular economy campaigner from Friends of the Earth Scotland said: “A handful of countries and corporations have sabotaged the negotiations for a global plastics treaty, putting their profits before a world without plastic pollution.
“This international agreement had the potential to make a hugely positive impact, but we can’t let its delay stop progress that can be made now to reduce the harmful impacts of plastic.
“Scotland has rightly joined with the many countries, civil society organisations and communities calling for action on the plastics crisis."
Scotland is one of the 85 countries supporting the idea of a strong treaty to better deal with plastic pollution.
On October 29, 2024, an open letter by Friends of the Earth Scotland and other organisations was sent to First Minister John Swinney and Gillian Martin MSP, Acting Cabinet Secretary for Net Zero and Energy.
The letter was signed by 29 climate organisations.
The open letter stated that the quantity of microplastics found in brain samples has almost doubled since 2016 and “millions of tonnes of plastics are exported from rich countries” to southern countries with 60% of all recycled plastics managed by waste pickers.
Waste pickers are unacknowledged workers who collect plastic waste for resale, often under poor working conditions. It is estimated that around 20 million people rely on this work to earn a living.
Swinney answered the open letter on November 5 and stated that the “Scottish Government fully supports the Global Plastics Treaty” and is closely working with the UK Government on the matter.
“It is my expectation that the finalisation of a Treaty will improve plastics management internationally," he said.
The First Minister then resumed the current measures taken in Scotland to tackle the plastic problem.
“Our relationship with plastics must change to prevent further pollution,” Swinney stated at the end of his letter.
Friends of the Earth Scotland has welcomed the answer of Scotland’s First Minister but has stated that “there is plenty of action” that Swinney should drive forward to help Scotland tackle plastic pollution.
“With the failure of the talks, it is now more important than ever that the Scottish Government demonstrates its commitment to ending plastic pollution by embracing and implementing ambitious policies to curb the scourge of plastic pollution in Scotland,” Pratt said.
After the meeting in South Korea ended without an agreement, the negotiations are scheduled to resume in 2025.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here