THE SNP has accused Labour in Scotland of “distancing” itself from the Westminster party over winter fuel allowance cuts.
Stephen Gethins, the SNP MP for Arbroath and Broughty Ferry, asked Scottish Secretary Ian Murray whether his party’s message north of the border is that voters should elect Labour “to stop Labour”.
It comes after Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar vowed last month to “reinstate the winter fuel payment for pensioners in Scotland” if his party wins the 2026 Holyrood election.
The Westminster Government shrank the previously universal winter fuel payment scheme across England, Northern Ireland and Wales earlier this year, instead issuing the sums of up to £300 to eligible benefits claimants only.
READ MORE: Majority 'better off' financially because they live in Scotland after Budget
The SNP-led Scottish Government also introduced means testing for its Pension Age Winter Heating Payment, which it said was a “result” of the decision in London.
It has since promised to reintroduce winter fuel payments for all Scottish pensioners next year.
Gethins (below) told MPs on Wednesday: “The Scottish Government will continue to protect the most vulnerable in society from the excesses of Westminster cuts, where instead of Tory cuts, it will be Labour cuts when it comes to the winter fuel payments.
“So can the Secretary of State tell me, does he agree with the cut to the winter fuel allowance?”
Referring to an uplift in the Barnett consequentials, confirmed in October’s Budget, Murray replied: “There’s 4.9 billion reasons why that question was rubbish.”
Gethins came back: “I have to say, I’m not surprised. There’s huge confusion in the Labour Party about the winter fuel allowance.
“The Scottish Government is doing something about it. The UK Government is not.
“Now, the Secretary of State did not even know the number of pensioners who would be affected by the winter fuel cut.
“Labour are now distancing themselves from Labour, so can he tell me, is the message that his party’s sending out is vote Labour to stop Labour, or should voters just vote for the party that are actually doing something about it?”
Murray (below) said in his response that “the winter fuel payment in Scotland is devolved”.
Conservative shadow Scottish secretary Andrew Bowie had earlier pressed on which sectors will grow following October’s Budget.
Bowie told the Commons: “To grow, you need confidence from business, so let’s just see how that is going because the verdict from Scottish businesses to his Government’s Budget is in.
“From OEUK (Offshore Energies UK): ‘This is a difficult day for the sector’. From Scottish Hospitality: ‘Today’s announcements are a blow to businesses across the country’. From the Scotch Whisky Association: The increase in spirt duty ‘is a hammer blow’. From the NFUS (National Farmers Union of Scotland): the decisions will cause ‘huge difficulties to farming’.
“So, given these responses, if it isn’t from retail, or oil and gas, or hospitality, or food and drink, or financial services, from which sector does he think this mythical growth is going to come?”
Murray told MPs: “Unlike (Mr Bowie), I have actually run my own business. And when you run your own business, what you need is stability, what you need is credibility, what you need is confidence.
“The previous government left this economy in tatters. They crashed the economy. They left business confidence at a record low.
“We’re investing for the future and businesses back that.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel