ARRIVING at COP27 by plane may not be ideal, but it felt as though the journey gave a snapshot of the issues facing our planet. We flew over the Alps, where glaciers are melting faster than ever; the Suez Canal, where enormous tankers lined up to transport oil and goods around the world; and came into land in the desert around Sharm El-Sheikh.
Living in the Scottish Highlands where access to water has – let’s face it – never been an issue, Sharm El-Sheikh gives you an insight into the necessity of water and what life looks like without it. The whole resort – and really, that’s all it is – only exists because of the massive amount of desalinated water that is pumped here.
All around, the barren desert seems to contain almost no life. Beyond the massively irrigated small patches of turf and palm trees that line the roads here, there are no plants, little in the way of birds and no pollinating insects. It was a rare and beautiful sight to see two butterflies dancing together.
READ MORE: Windfall tax increase 'makes little difference' while subsidies remain
Now, as the end of COP27 approaches, there is still much to do and be agreed on if we want to avoid temperatures rising to a point that those glaciers disappear altogether and drought conditions become the norm for vast swathes of the planet.
Reports coming out of the negotiations seem to suggest there has not yet been enough progress on any of the three main pillars of discussion: mitigation, adaptation or loss and damage, despite it finally being put onto the agenda for the first time.
Last Saturday, people gathered all across the world to march and call for climate justice and show solidarity for Egyptian human rights groups. Solidarity is much needed here, in a country where protest is banned and activists are routinely jailed.
COP27 in Sharm El-Sheikh is a far cry from Glasgow when, on any given street corner, you would have come across protesters singing outside a bank, school children holding placards or a refugee puppet.
Only by organising actions within the UN-controlled space of the Blue Zone have voices of dissent been able to be heard here, and even then, there have been reports of surveillance and intimidation.
At a press conference I was at where Sanaa Seif – the sister of jailed Egyptian-British pro-democracy activist Alaa Abd El-Fattah – spoke, an Egyptian politician had to be forcibly removed after refusing to stop his aggressive tirade. Other civil society COP27 participants have reported being followed and filmed in private meetings.
The Green Zone, too, is a world away from its Glasgow counterpart. Set in a botanic garden with sculptures of giant bunnies and daisies, music pumping and food vans, the outside spaces have a festival feel, but one that is deserted.
While the Glasgow Green Zone bustled with school groups, film screenings and activist stalls, here the cavernous halls of mainly trade stands are often eerily empty.
Ooutwith the fences of the Blue Zone, there is an enormous police presence, with regular roadblocks, patrols on every road and the slightly surreal sight of men in dark suits standing solitary, spaced out across the empty desert, reportedly state Mukhabarat agents.
Before arriving here, I was warned to be careful of what I said and to avoid the official COP app, which reportedly allows Egyptian authorities to track your movement. Only now do I feel free to write about these things. I worry for those left behind in Egypt who have had the courage to speak out.
I only hope that the voices of these activists and marchers reach the decision-makers and are listened to.
I watched as Air Force One flew in on Friday, bringing President Biden and his positive rhetoric, but he flew out again three hours later, leaving little in the way of tangible commitments in his wake.
Others have arrived this week to add their views, from president-elect Lula of Brazil, with new hope for the protection of the Amazon, to singer Ellie Goulding, but it is up to the ministers and delegations thrashing out the details of agreements that the success of this COP27 hangs.
As the climate clock on the youth pavilion constantly reminded us, we have less than seven years to avert climate catastrophe.
Travelling home, attention naturally shifts to what we are doing in Scotland to avert this catastrophe. Sadly, the answer is not yet enough.
During my time at COP27, I was part of meetings with both Nicola Sturgeon and Environment Minister Mairi McAllan. While encouraged by their desire to hear from climate experts from the Global South and take forward the issue of loss and damage, the reality is the most important thing Scotland can do now is reduce our emissions.
With climate targets missed in three of the last four years, now is the time to step up, play our part and prevent future damages.
Despite this seemingly slow progress at COP27 and at home, I remain optimistic that the groundswell of support for action will turn the tide and spur on action.
While here, I’ve done video calls with schools back home and for those children and young people everywhere, I need to have hope.
I need to believe we can achieve the necessary emission cuts because, well – what’s the alternative?
Kirstie Shirra is a board member at Stop Climate Chaos Scotland
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel