ANDY Burnham seems to have a pretty short memory.
The mayor of Greater Manchester is furious about a travel ban having been imposed on two cities in his region, Manchester and Salford, but seems to have forgotten his silence when a similar ban was imposed on a third, Bolton, last month.
The difference in approaches can’t possibly be because Keir Starmer’s position at the head of the Labour party is much weaker now than four weeks ago.
Burnham can’t possibly be plotting a leadership bid. He strongly refutes the allegations.
Has he forgotten having already tried twice before?
READ MORE: Ambitious, calculated Andy Burnham has a lot to gain from a spat with Nicola Sturgeon
Another fact Burnham seems to have forgotten is that the rest of us do pay attention to the news.
Today, while attacking the Scottish Government for failing to notify him of incoming travel restrictions on his area, the Labour man said: “We have our differences with the UK Government, but they have genuinely got in touch with us to discuss what they were planning to do beforehand.”
The UK Government has “genuinely got in touch … to discuss what they were planning to do beforehand”?
Really?
Has Burnham forgotten that we get the English news in Scotland too?
Anyone paying attention in October last year, when Burnham was busy making his name attacking a different government, may remember why that statement doesn’t quite hold water.
READ MORE: Andy Burnham and Nicola Sturgeon to meet after battle over travel ban
At the time Greater Manchester had been placed onto the third English tier of lockdown, one of the highest in the country.
In order to alleviate the impact of these strict restrictions on people’s livelihoods, Burnham had asked the UK Government for £90 million.
Burnham wanted at least £75m, but would take a “bare minimum” of £65m. The UK Government offered £60m.
Then, on live TV while giving a speech to this effect, the Greater Manchester mayor found out that the UK Government was actually only giving his region £20m.
I get the feeling that this moment will be replayed again and again and again.
— Tom Swarbrick (@TomSwarbrick1) October 20, 2020
Politically, absolutely toxic. pic.twitter.com/1LqutiD2Gm
The announcement wasn’t even made to him, but emailed to MPs.
Burnham’s reaction to learning this news was captured live, as were the members of the crowd who shouted “disgrace” a lot.
The mayor’s face as he read the news, followed by his exasperated expression, soon became a meme.
— Calgie (@christiancalgie) October 20, 2020
— Grant Tucker (@GrantTucker) October 20, 2020
We’re not as used to the political nuances involved in Westminster speak as former health, former culture, and former treasury secretary Burnham, but that’s not “genuinely getting in touch to discuss what you are planning to do beforehand” in our book.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel