IT'S been a little over 15 years since the Thatcher-era Section 28 legislation, which prohibited the teaching of LGBT issues in schools, was fully repealed across the UK.
Since then, equal marriage has passed into law and the Scottish Government has confirmned that LGBT education will become a mandatory part of the school curriculum.
In England, however, anti-LGBT campaigners have restarted a discussion on whether or not schools should recognise the existence of lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans identities and relationships.
The position that LGBT-inclusion should even be up for debate in 2019 has been widely criticised by pro-human rights campaigners – and the BBC have come under fire for giving "credibility" to the belief that not everyone should be taught about their rights.
In a now-deleted tweet from BBC Radio 4's Woman's Hour, the broadcaster asked "Do you think LGBT rights should be taught in schools?" with a link to a discussion they held around an on-going dispute in Birmingham.
The tweet received fierce criticism, with SNP MP Mhairi Black responding: "In what world would we not teach EVERYONE about their rights? Being LGBT isn't a disease, it isn't contagious, it's not even a question – this 'debate' shouldn't be given this kind of huge platform or credibility."
In what world would we not teach EVERYONE about their rights? Being LGBT isn't a disease, it isn't contagious, it's not even a question - this "debate" shouldn't be given this kind of huge platform or credibility. https://t.co/XTeoPtfN9p
— Mhairi Black MP (@MhairiBlack) March 26, 2019
Others also shared their frustration with how the subject was framed.
Why is this a question? Do LGBT people have rights? Do they experience harassment? Are there LGBT kids in every classroom of every school? Then yes, they should be taught, just like gender equality and racial history.
— Tom Coates (@tomcoates) March 25, 2019
Next week on Woman's Hour "Do you think racial equality should be taught in schools?"
— Steve Wardlaw (@WardlawSteve) March 26, 2019
Also it's not 'rights', it's equality. And you aren't just teaching it to people who know nothing about it, you are supporting LGBT+ kids and parents. What a loaded question.
Can’t believe @BBCWomansHour would tweet and legitimise the blatant homophobia of the people protesting LGBT Rights. Exchange LGBT for black or women’s and see if it would be up for debate. Lost all respect. Damage is done. pic.twitter.com/bKXC6BmJMq
— Sober Spice Craig (@cracka1984) March 26, 2019
Why are you even asking this, you legitimize the hate of bigots with this kind of shit. Yes, of course they should be taught, promoting ignorance is promoting hate.
— 🏳️🌈⚡Gloria - The Trans Giant⚡🏳️🌈 (@TheTransGiant) March 26, 2019
This 👏 is 👏 not 👏 a 👏 debate 👏https://t.co/XFtz2cYAEY
— Stephen Paton 🌿 (@stephenpaton134) March 26, 2019
we protested and fought hard in the 1980's so this was no longer a question in the 21st century. The BBC needs to stop pushing hate and fascism on the public.
— Robertson Malt (@Robertsonmalt) March 26, 2019
.@BBCWomansHour just deleted their LGBT rights tweet from yesterday. Equality, human rights and the existence of LGBT people aren’t a debate. Stop constantly trying to make it one. pic.twitter.com/7oFSNpUCaf
— Sarah O'Connell (@SarahO_Connell) March 26, 2019
The BBC Twitter account later deleted the tweet, releasing the statement that "this item discussed the parent protests against the teaching of LGBT sex education in English schools. We heard from a parent who disagrees with the policy & a Birmingham head teacher. Our earlier tweet didn't reflect the item & we have removed it".
Noticeably, this was not an apology so much as a justification.
One commentator had a final point to share on the issue.
I see @BBCWomansHour have deleted their tweet about whether to keep LGBTQ rights out of schools, but doubt there will be any real soul-searching. In the early 2000s, one MP called Section 28 a "common sense" "comfort" to parents, and now she's Prime Minister.
— Charlie Lyne (@charlielyne) March 26, 2019
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel