Bereaved relatives who lost loved ones in Northern Ireland’s Troubles are united against a proposed statute of limitations on legacy prosecutions.
The victim sector, which includes a wide range of views on how to deal with the past, came together with one voice to slam Brandon Lewis’ proposals as a “betrayal”.
Families of the 10 killed by soldiers in the Ballymurphy area of west Belfast in 1971 watched Mr Lewis’ statement to the House of Commons on Wednesday.
A fresh inquest into the deaths of the woman and nine men earlier this year found they were “entirely innocent”.
Eileen McKeown, daughter of Joseph Corr, said they see the proposed statute of limitations on Troubles prosecutions as the British Government’s “cynical attempt to bring an amnesty and a plan to bury its war crimes”.
She said the proposals “will not be tolerated and will be legally challenged”.
“The Ballymurphy Massacre inquest findings show how the law should work independently,” she said.
“All victims need to know the truth, they need to know what happened to their loved ones.
“We all bleed the same blood so everybody needs truth and justice and then maybe they can start living their lives.
“We spent 50 years trying to prove that our loved ones were innocent, there are loads of families out there like us and they all need to know the same thing.”
Michael O’Hare, whose 12-year-old sister Majella was shot by a soldier in 1976, said the legacy proposals set out by Brandon Lewis were an “utter and unacceptable betrayal”.
Mr O’Hare, supported by Amnesty, is calling for an independent investigation into the killing.
He said: “The UK Government is inflicting great pain on my family and other victims denied justice.
“Our Majella had her life cruelly robbed, at the tender age of 12, by bullets from a soldier’s machine gun.
“She was an innocent child with her whole life ahead of her.
“The Ministry of Defence apologised to my family, but a proper investigation has never happened.
“The UK Government is now trying to deny us meaningful truth and justice forever.
“I will never stop fighting for Majella, my sister deserves justice.
“I hope these proposals are firmly rejected.
“I call on all parties involved to end the perpetual cycle of victims being failed.”
Meanwhile Ulster Human Rights Watch slammed the legacy proposals as a “betrayal to victims and former police and military veterans”.
Advocacy manager Axel Schmidt described the Government’s position on legacy as a “sorry mess” and an “affront to men and women who wore a uniform to counter gangs of terrorist murderers”.
“The proposals deny innocent victims justice by exonerating the gunman and bomber.
“Ministers are saying there is equivalence between soldiers, police officers and terrorists and that is disgraceful,” he said.
“To equate officers and military veterans, agents of the State, in the same bracket as those who were hell-bent on murdering them makes a laughing stock out of our system of justice.
“This is a denial of justice, a betrayal of victims and former police officers and military veterans who suffered appalling losses as they worked courageously to protect the community from anarchy.
“We will now mount a campaign to halt what amounts to a sellout.
“We intend galvanising political support to make ministers think again about these foolhardy and rash proposals.”
Relatives for Justice said it was the “single worst day for all victims during our peace process”.
“This proposal is the mother of all cover-ups,” chief executive Mark Thompson said.
“Having perniciously fought families for all of this time, for the British Government to now somehow suggest that without the rule of law the UK Government will hand over truth and information to families out of the goodness of their hearts is an insult to our collective intelligence and a denial of our collective experience,” he said.
“These proposals will legalise state impunity. In order to achieve this, the UK Government is willing to make the interests of every single person affected by every single killing expendable – this is breathtaking.”
Innocent Victims United spokesman Kenny Donaldson said it is not for the UK Prime Minister, Taoiseach or any other representative of government to “arbitrarily close down justice”.
He said: “For today’s politicians ‘The Troubles’ are ‘The Past’ and are treated with a past-tense approach.
However, for those who were directly impacted, the legacy of that terror and violence remains with them, and they continue to yearn for justice and accountability for the heinous and unjust actions which they were subjected.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here