Technology giants Microsoft, Twitter, Snapchat and TikTok have been asked by MPs to provide details on how they combat scams and protect consumers as part of an ongoing inquiry into online fraud.
Treasury Committee chair Mel Stride has asked the companies for details on the revenue they receive from adverts around investment opportunities, and what policies are in place to compensate scam victims.
The letter also asked whether platforms insist that firms must be authorised by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in order to advertise on their sites.
The request comes as the committee continues its inquiry into economic crime, and follows a similar request to Google, Facebook, Amazon and eBay for more details on their plans to tackle online fraud.
Mr Stride said: “Online platforms have changed the way we live, work and socialise. However, it’s clear that fraud is rapidly rising and ruining people’s lives. Scammers seem to act with impunity online and their actions can have devastating consequences.
“As a committee, we are investigating the causes, scale and effects of economic crime. We want to gain a clearer understanding of the actions tech companies are taking to combat fraud and protect consumers online.
“That’s why I have today written to Microsoft, Twitter, Snapchat and TikTok to request information on how they are preventing their users from falling victim to scams.”
The request also comes as MPs and peers continue to scrutinise the draft Online Safety Bill, with some calling from online fraud to be placed within the scope of the proposed legislation, which would see platforms penalised for failing to protect users from harmful content.
📨We've written to @Microsoft, @Twitter, @Snapchat and @tiktok_uk, as our #EconomicCrime inquiry continues.
🔎We're seeking answers on their policies to combat economic crime, prevent fraud, and protect consumers.
You can read the letters here👇https://t.co/ycdLVKbnrB
— Treasury Committee (@CommonsTreasury) November 5, 2021
Mr Stride added: “It is also imperative that the Government takes further action in this area. We have long suggested that including fraudulent advertisements within the scope of the Online Safety Bill would be a good place to start.
“Without co-ordinated action, I fear many more people will sadly fall victim to these scammers.”
On Thursday, Culture Secretary Nadine Dorries told the Draft Online Safety Bill (Joint Committee) that she wants to beef up the penalties proposed in the new legislation by accelerating the introduction of personal liability sanctions for company managers to spark a faster response to the threat of online harms.
Alongside large fines and blocking site access, the draft Bill includes personal criminal liability sanctions for executives which can be introduced two years after the implementation of the Bill, but Ms Dorries told the committee she is looking to bring this forward to between three and six months.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here