Intel apologised on Thursday for asking suppliers to avoid sourcing goods from the Chinese province of Xinjiang after the world’s biggest chipmaker joined other foreign brands in facing the fury of state media over complaints of abuses by the ruling Communist Party in the mostly muslim region.
Intel’s request was “arrogant and vicious,” said the Global Times, a newspaper published by China’s ruling party.
The reference to Xinjiang in a letter to suppliers was aimed at complying with US regulations, Intel said on its social media account.
Washington has barred imports of goods from Xinjiang over complaints of mass detentions of Uighur muslims, forced abortions and forced labour, which Beijing denies.
Tension over Xinjiang is rising as activists call for a boycott of February’s Winter Olympics in Beijing, a prestige project for the ruling party.
The White House says the United States will not send dignitaries. Beijing on Wednesday barred four members of a US government religious freedom panel from China in retaliation for sanctions imposed by Washington on two Xinjiang leaders.
“So-called forced labour and other allegations on Xinjiang are completely lies concocted by anti-China forces,” said a foreign ministry spokesman, Zhao Lijian. He called on Intel to “respect facts and tell right from wrong”.
Some commentators online, where comments the ruling party does not want are deleted by censors, called for a boycott of Intel products.
Intel processor chips are used in smartphones, computers and other products.
The letter caused “concerns among our cherished Chinese partners, which we deeply regret,” said an Intel statement.
“We apologise for the trouble caused to our respected Chinese customers, partners and the public,” the company said.
Other companies including retailer H&M and shoe brand Nike have been targeted for criticism and calls for boycotts after expressing concern about Xinjiang or saying they would stop using materials produced there.
The Chinese government rejects complaints of abuses in Xinjiang but companies say they are unable to carry out independent audits of factories and other workplaces.
Pop singer Wang Junkai, also known as Karry Wang, announced on Wednesday he was pulling out of a deal to act as “brand ambassador” for Intel’s Core line of processor chips.
Wang’s move is a “fresh warning siren to Intel and other foreign companies that seek to undermine China’s core interests while also trying to profit from the vast Chinese market,” said Global Times, which is known for its nationalistic tone.
Other singers, actors and other celebrities have broken ties with foreign brands that were targeted for criticism over Xinjiang, giving up millions of dollars in income to protect their careers from official retaliation.
Xinjiang is a major supplier of silica used in making computer chips. Intel has a chip factory in Dalian in China’s north east — its only one in Asia and one of four outside the United States. The company also has a research facility in Beijing.
Criticism by state media might prompt consumers to look at products based on chips from other suppliers. But there are few alternatives. The include Advanced Micro Devices of the United States for chips in desktop PCs and servers and Britain’s Arm for smartphones.
The Communist Party has spent billions of dollars to build a Chinese chip industry and reduce reliance on the United States, Taiwan and other suppliers.
But its manufacturers are far from achieving the level of precision required for the most advanced chips from Intel and other global suppliers.
Intel, headquartered in Santa Clara, California, reported 2020 profits of $23.7 billion (£17.7 billion) on sales of $77.9 billion (£58.2 billion) .
Smartphones and other products are designed to work with the characteristics of a specific chip from one supplier. Switching chips would require a design overhaul and testing that might require years.
Trying to switch to alternate suppliers would be especially hard and costly at a time when a global shortage of chips due to the coronavirus pandemic is disrupting production of products from smartphones to cars.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here