Sue Gray’s inquiry into allegations of lockdown-breaching parties at the heart of Government may have been seriously hindered by the police investigation.
But her update into the Cabinet Office investigation published on Monday still contains some damning verdicts and explosive revelations.
– Police investigating at least 12 events
Ms Gray looked into 16 separate gatherings across Downing Street and wider Government between May 15 2020 and April 16 last year.
Of those, her report sets out that the Metropolitan Police are now investigating all but four of those events.
Scotland Yard said it was investigating allegations spanning eight dates, but did not set out how many specific allegations they were looking at.
– Gatherings include PM’s birthday and event in official flat
The dozen events being looked at by officers include a “gathering in the No 10 Downing Street flat” on November 13 2020, the night Mr Johnson’s former aides Dominic Cummings and Lee Cain left their roles during a bitter power struggle.
Police were also investigating the June 19 2020 event in the Cabinet Room at No 10 to mark the Prime Minister’s 56th birthday.
Two other Downing Street gatherings that officers are inspecting took place on April 16 last year, on the eve of the Duke of Edinburgh’s funeral, when the Queen was pictured mourning alone.
– Gray held back much of what she learned
Ms Gray conceded it was “not possible at present to provide a meaningful report” about the “extensive factual information” she has unearthed about the events under police investigation while officers were continuing their work.
She decided against publishing “factual accounts” about the remaining four events, saying: “I do not feel that I am able to do so without detriment to the overall balance of the findings.”
Downing Street caved to pressure to concede it would ask Ms Gray to publish a fresh assessment after the police investigation concludes.
– Failures of leadership and too much drinking
Despite that, Ms Gray was able to conclude: “At least some of the gatherings in question represent a serious failure to observe not just the high standards expected of those working at the heart of Government but also of the standards expected of the entire British population at the time.”
She criticised “failures of leadership and judgment” in No 10 and the Cabinet Office.
“Some of the events should not have been allowed to take place. Other events should not have been allowed to develop as they did,” she added.
Ms Gray, who was for a time a pub landlady, called for a robust policy to cover drinking in Government, saying that the “excessive consumption of alcohol is not appropriate”.
– Pity for the ‘fall guy’
One staff member believed to have been lined up for the chop to appease public anger is Martin Reynolds, the Prime Minister’s principal private secretary sent the email inviting staff to the “bring your own booze” event in the first lockdown.
But Ms Gray has made that sacking a little bit harder by noting that with swelling staff size in No 10 the leadership structures “fragmented and complicated and this has sometimes led to the blurring of lines of accountability”.
“Too much responsibility and expectation is placed on the senior official whose principal function is the direct support of the Prime Minister. This should be addressed as a matter of priority,” Ms Gray wrote.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel