The former head of the BBC has criticised the broadcaster’s coverage of certain political events, saying the tone is “gleeful and disrespectful”.
Lord Michael Grade said the corporation was right to hold the government to account but added that its “macho culture” was “unnecessary”.
Grade, 78, has held top jobs at all three of the UK’s main broadcasters – the BBC, Channel 4 and ITV.
Speaking to the Daily Telegraph he said: “What I don’t like is the tone.”
“Take the BBC’s coverage of the current political crisis. It’s the lead story, of course – I’m not questioning their news values.
“Nor am I questioning the BBC’s objectivity, and the reason I don’t is that if you talk to Jeremy Corbyn… he would think the media were a nest of vipers because they gave him a hard time, and very rightly, over anti-Semitism.
“The BBC was on that story in the same way they’re now on the ‘partygate’ story.
“But the tone is too aggressive. It’s so gleeful and disrespectful.
“‘Are you lying to the British public?’ It makes them sound as if they’ve made up their minds, which I don’t think they have, but it’s: ‘We’ve got a story – we’re going to nail this b******’.
“They’re right to hold the Prime Minister to account. I have no problem with that.
“But there seems to be a sense at the BBC that if you ask difficult questions politely, your colleagues are going to say: ‘You let him or her off the hook’.
“It’s a macho culture. It’s unnecessary, and I don’t like it.”
Grade currently sits as a Conservative peer in the House of Lords after being appointed by David Cameron in 2010.
He also admitted that he has “kept my hat in the ring” for the position of Ofcom chief executive, after having had “second thoughts” about applying.
The process to fill the senior position at the media regulator has faced a series of delays since it began two years ago and is now being rerun after an initial round of interviews failed to find a suitable candidate.
Former Daily Mail editor Paul Dacre was reportedly Boris Johnson’s preferred choice during the initial interviews, but he withdrew from the race, claiming the civil service had influenced the process because of his right-of-centre “convictions”.
“I became suspicious of the process, until I realised Sue Gray was back in charge of the appointment after her ‘partygate’ exertions,” Grade said.
“I was fully reassured and am now happy to keep my hat in the ring.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel