Boris Johnson has been warned the Conservatives will “reap the whirlwind” of the No 10 lockdown parties saga at the ballot box as the threat of more police fines hangs over him.
Former Conservative minister Steve Baker told The Daily Telegraph the partygate affair could hurt the Tories at the local elections on May 5, with his constituents expressing “fury” at reports of lockdown breaches in Downing Street.
It comes after the influential backbencher turned on the Prime Minister in the Commons this week, telling MPs the Conservative Party leader should have realised the “gig’s up” after the Metropolitan Police concluded he had breached his own coronavirus rules.
“People lived under barbaric rules. They were told that if they deviated one iota from the law they would kill people. And they suffered for it,” Mr Baker, who hinted that he had submitted a letter of no confidence in the Prime Minister, told the newspaper.
“Meanwhile in No 10, where they should have been obeying both the letter and spirit of the rules, clearly they breached both.
“It’s been a disaster and I fear we will reap the whirlwind on polling day.”
It comes after reports by ITV that fine notices have started landing in the email inboxes of officials who attended a “bring your own bottle” drinks do in the Downing Street garden on May 20 2020 during England’s first Covid lockdown when indoor and outdoor gatherings were banned.
No 10 said on Friday evening Mr Johnson, who has admitted attending but insisted he “believed implicitly that this was a work event”, has not received notice of a fine in relation to the gathering.
But with the Prime Minister having already been fined once for attending his own birthday bash in June 2020, there is the risk he could be fined further times, with claims that police are looking into another five possible rule-breaking events he is said to have attended.
The Met has said it will make no public update on the number of fines issued until after the local elections, but Downing Street, has stated it will still declare whether the Prime Minister receives further fines in the lead up to polling day.
Mr Johnson is facing calls to resign over the partygate affair, with prominent backbenchers such as Mr Baker and ex-defence minister Tobias Ellwood among those to call for him to quit.
The Guardian said allies of former foreign secretary Jeremy Hunt and trade minister Penny Mordaunt had been making “discrete preparations” for a leadership contest should Tory MPs move to topple Mr Johnson.
A widespread Tory revolt was rumoured to be behind the Downing Street decision to abandon a plan on Thursday to delay a Commons investigation into whether he misled Parliament with his repeated assurances that Covid rules were followed in No 10.
As well as the Scotland Yard probe and investigation by senior civil servant Sue Gray into the partygate claims, the PM will be subject to a third inquiry by the Privileges Committee, which will seek to determine whether he knew about the alleged rule breaches before making his statements to MPs.
Facing questions about the alleged parties during his final day in India on Friday, the Prime Minister suggested his administration had received a “pretty good kick” as a result of MPs’ decision to refer him to a new investigation.
But he backed himself to still be in power in the autumn, having set the target of signing a trade deal with New Delhi by October.
Chris Bryant, chair of the Privileges Committee, has recused himself from the parliamentary investigation, having made his views on Mr Johnson’s conduct plain in the media.
The Labour MP, writing in the Daily Mirror, said the Prime Minister “doesn’t have it in him to be honest” and accused him of being “not fit to govern”.
“Johnson was lying when he told the Commons no laws were broken – and he knows it, because he was there when the laws were broken,” Mr Bryant said.
Asked for a reply to the comments, a No 10 spokeswoman pointed to Mr Johnson’s response to the Privileges Committee probe when he told broadcasters on Thursday he had “absolutely nothing, frankly, to hide”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel