The MSP who wants to change the law to allow assisted dying in Scotland said an “overwhelming” response to a consultation on his plans shows a majority support such a measure.
A total of 14,038 responses were received in the consultation into Liam McArthur’s proposed Bill – the highest number ever submitted for a proposed Member’s Bill at Holyrood.
Speaking ahead of lodging a final proposal for the Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill on Thursday, the Liberal Democrat MSP said he hopes to bring legislation to the Scottish Parliament next year.
Mr McArthur, the Liberal Democrat MSP for Orkney, now needs to win support from other politicians at Holyrood before his Bill can proceed.
Holyrood has already voted down two attempts to legislate for assisted dying, but Mr McArthur insisted it is “a law that’s time has come”.
All deaths under the scheme would be recorded and reported for safety, monitoring and research purposes.
Mr McArthur told how during the consultation he had “heard from dying people who would very much like to have this choice available to them as their illness progresses”.
Without legislation to permit assisted dying, he said people could face “a series of unimaginable choices”. He said that his proposals could give them “peace of mind in their final months knowing that if they need it when the time comes they can have a peaceful death that is right for them”.
The MSP continued: “I have also been particularly struck by many harrowing accounts from those who witnessed their loved ones endure a bad death.
“They sent a powerful message that, even with excellent palliative care, the option of an assisted death would have made such a difference in terms of reducing unnecessary suffering.
“A safe and compassionate assisted dying law is a law that’s time has come.
“I am pleased to be lodging the final proposal for the Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults Member’s Bill in the Scottish Parliament today.
“I am confident of receiving the necessary signatures from my MSP colleagues which allows me to proceed with the drafting of a Bill I hope to introduce to Parliament next year. I then look forward to taking the Bill through its parliamentary journey.”
The proposals already have the backing of the Humanist Society of Scotland, whose chief executive Fraser Sutherland said: “Humanism is rooted in the idea that all humans must have autonomy over their bodies, and the right to an assisted death has been something that we have supported and campaigned for across three attempts to change the law in Scotland.
“Today we urge Scotland’s MSPs to back the Bill and be on side with the views of the majority of Scotland’s population, and bring safe and legal access to assisted dying in Scotland.”
But Dr Gordon Macdonald, of the campaign group Care Not Killing, which is spearheading opposition to the Bill, said: “Evidence from other countries shows that when assisted suicide or euthanasia are legalised, the safeguards promised are quickly removed and the law is extended to include more and more vulnerable people.
“People will come under pressure from others to end their lives for fear of being a financial or care burden. People with depression won’t get the proper psychiatric support they need and palliative care services will continue to be underfunded.
“This is a very dangerous Bill and the proponents of a change in the law have failed to address these concerns or even to engage in a debate about them.
“We need to care for people who are suffering, not encourage them or provide them with a mechanism to end their lives. This is why we champion the extension of high quality palliative care to all those who need it and better support for their families.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel