Rishi Sunak is facing calls to expand the windfall tax on fossil fuel giants after Shell avoided paying the levy despite a doubling of profits fuelled by soaring energy prices.
The British multinational adjusted its earnings for the three months to the end of September to £8.2 billion, twice that of the same period last year.
Having profited to the tune of nearly £10 billion earlier in the year, the company is on course for its most profitable year ever.
But despite this Shell does not expect to pay the windfall tax introduced by the Prime Minister while chancellor earlier this year because of its scale of investment.
Climate activists and opposition MPs are urging the Prime Minister to go further on his windfall tax as oil and gas giants see profits soar over Russia’s war in Ukraine.
Downing Street said “nothing is off the table” ahead of Chancellor Jeremy Hunt’s autumn budget on November 17.
Shadow climate change secretary Ed Miliband said Shell’s profits are “further proof that we need a proper windfall tax to make the energy companies pay their fair share”.
“Rishi Sunak’s existing plans are a pale imitation of Labour’s windfall tax and would see billions of pounds of taxpayer money go back into the pockets of oil and gas giants through ludicrous tax breaks,” he said.
“It tells you everything you need to know about whose side this Conservative Government is on that they refuse to back Labour’s proper windfall tax whilst working people, families, and pensioners suffer.”
In May, Mr Sunak introduced a windfall tax that strongly incentivised firms to invest by including tax relief in exchange for investment.
He announced the 25% surcharge on extraordinary profits to help pay for a package of support for households struggling with the cost-of-living crisis.
His plans are due to lapse at the end of 2025 or sooner if oil and gas prices return to “historically more normal levels”, as Vladimir Putin’s invasion pushes up prices.
Finance boss Sinead Gorman told reporters on Thursday that the company had done enough through significant capital expenditure in recent months to avoid the tax.
“Heavy capex has meant that we haven’t had extra tax coming through in this quarter yet,” she said.
“I do expect to see that extra tax … to happen quite early in the first quarter of 2023, but we’ll see what plays out with prices as well.”
She added: “We simply are investing more heavily than we have, and therefore we don’t have profits which we can be taxed against.”
Greenpeace called for a “proper tax” on the energy giant’s profits as they continue to bank billions.
Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey said: “The Conservative Government’s refusal to properly tax these eye-watering profits is an insult to families struggling to pay their energy bills.
“Even the chief executive of Shell has admitted that oil and gas companies should be taxed more to help protect vulnerable households.
“It’s time Rishi Sunak introduced a proper windfall tax and used the extra money to support people facing heart-breaking choices this winter.”
Asked on LBC radio about an extended windfall tax, Tory party chairman Nadhim Zahawi said that “absolutely the Chancellor and the Prime Minister will look at every decision”.
But he warned against creating “a tax system that disincentivises investment”.
The Prime Minister’s official spokesman said: “I am not going to get into tax measures ahead of a fiscal event.
“It is accurate to say, as we made clear, no options are off the table given the economic circumstances. But clearly that is for the autumn statement.”
Mr Sunak does not believe the current levy has been hindering investment, the spokesman said.
Banks have also been enjoying bumper profits as they benefit from rising interest rates.
Downing Street did not rule out a windfall tax on them either, with the spokesman saying: “I haven’t asked the Prime Minister directly but broadly speaking hypothetical tax measures are for a fiscal event.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here