MPs did not have “all the facts” when they approved the appointment of BBC chairman Richard Sharp, ministers have been told.
Culture Secretary Michelle Donelan defended Mr Sharp’s appointment process as “rigorous”, and claimed that a cross-party committee of MPs had had a hand in the matter.
But SNP culture spokesman John Nicolson, who sits on the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee, hit back that MPs did not have all the facts on Mr Sharp.
The Government came under fire for the appointment after it emerged the BBC chairman helped secure Boris Johnson a loan of up to £800,000 before the then-prime minister backed his appointment to the broadcaster.
Mr Nicolson told the Commons: “I wonder if I can ask the Secretary of State if she believes the public think it is ever acceptable for anyone to donate hundreds of thousands to a political party and then be appointed by that same political party to a plum public post?
“In the case of BBC chair Richard Sharp having been interviewed, we now learn, by a panel including another Tory party donor. Really? Rigorous?”
Ms Donelan insisted the appointment process was “rigorous”, adding: “In addition, the House of Commons’ own select committee confirmed Mr Sharp’s appointment.”
Mr Nicolson, who is a member of the committee, shouted in reply: “We didn’t have all the facts.”
The Culture Secretary had earlier insisted the process was fair, after questioning from Labour.
Shadow culture secretary Lucy Powell said: “Half the DCMS (Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport) shortlisting panel for the BBC chair had close links to the Conservative Party, but even they managed to put forward five candidates.
“So what does the Secretary of State think it was about the close confidant of the former prime minister who was helping with his personal finances that first attracted him to appoint Mr Sharp over the other four candidates?
“And does she have confidence in the process that the actual and perceived conflicts of interests were fully disclosed?”
Ms Donelan replied: “Richard Sharp was appointed as chairman of the BBC following a rigorous appointment process made in line with the public appointments governance code and the BBC royal charter. The advisory assessment panel included a senior independent panel member approved by the commissioner for public appointments, who actually praised the process as fair and robust.
“In addition, there was a pre-appointment scrutiny at the House of Commons select committee which confirmed Mr Sharp’s appointment and I understand that the current commissioner for public appointments will be investigating.”
Mr Sharp has previously said he believed his selection process was conducted “by the book” and denied he had misled the advisory panel or MPs on the Commons Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee when he appeared before them.
The BBC chairman will appear again before the committee on February 7 to face questions, with acting chairman Damian Green writing to Mr Sharp on Tuesday to invite him to attend.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here