Extinction Rebellion co-founder Roger Hallam has been acquitted of conspiracy to damage property after taking part in a protest which involved throwing pink paint over several charity buildings.
The 56-year-old was cleared of the count along with three other protesters involved in demonstrations at the headquarters of Christian Aid, Amnesty International, Greenpeace and Friends of Earth on July 21 2020.
Hallam and fellow activists Ryan Simmonds, 36, Holly Brentnall, 31, and Valerie Brown, 70, were each cleared by a jury at Wood Green Crown Court in north London – though all but Brown still face further allegations.
The Extinction Rebellion creator previously told the court the quartet, who are part of Burning Pink group, targeted the charities because they felt they were not doing enough to tackle climate change.
At each charity premises, they asked to a hand in a letter before launching the paint and attaching copies of the letters to the buildings.
Nine environmental protesters have also been cleared by the same jury of a separate count of conspiracy to damage property.
This was in relation to a stunt which saw them spray pink paint over the headquarters of the Conservative, Labour, Liberal Democrat and Green Parties on or before August 13 2020.
Simmonds and Brentnall were found not guilty of the charge, along with Reverend Steven Nunn, 58, Dr Diana Warner, 63, Nicola Stickells, 52, Stefan Lindon, 59, Nicholas Cooper, 40, Genevieve Scherer, 76, and Richard Barnard, 50.
Some of the defendants stifled expressions of joy and embraced as Judge Andrew Holmes told the court: “Those who have been acquitted on the counts they are here for are free to go.”
Hallam, Brentnall, Cooper, Warner and Nunn will return to the same court on Tuesday over further charges relating to protests.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article