Israel’s parliament has passed the first of several laws that make up its contentious judicial overhaul as protesters opposing the changes staged another day of demonstrations over what they see as the country’s descent toward autocracy.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s coalition approved legislation that would protect the Israeli leader from being deemed unfit to rule over his corruption trial and claims of a conflict of interest surrounding his involvement in the legal changes.
Critics say the law is tailor-made for Mr Netanyahu, encourages corruption and deepens a gaping chasm between Israelis over the judicial overhaul.
The legal changes have split the nation between those who see the new policies as stripping Israel of its democratic ideals and those who think the country has been overrun by a liberal judiciary.
The government’s plan has plunged the nearly 75-year-old nation into one of its worst domestic crises.
The opposition is rooted in broad swaths of society — including business leaders and top legal officials.
Even the country’s military is enmeshed in the political conflict, with some reservists refusing to show up for duty over the changes.
Israel’s international allies have also expressed concern.
On Thursday, protesters launched a fourth midweek day of demonstrations.
They blocked major roads, set tyres ablaze near an important seaport and draped a large Israeli flag and a copy of the country’s declaration of independence over the walls of Jerusalem’s Old City.
That was in addition to tens of thousands of people who have been showing up for weekly protests every Saturday night for more than two months.
Mr Netanyahu’s government rejected a compromise proposal earlier this month meant to ease the crisis.
It said it would slow the pace of the changes, pushing most of them until after a month-long recess in April.
But it was plowing forward on a key part of the overhaul, which would grant the government control over who becomes a judge.
The government says it amended the original Bill to make the law more inclusive but opponents rejected the move, saying the change is cosmetic and would maintain the government’s grip over the appointment of judges.
The measure was expected to pass next week.
The law to protect Mr Netanyahu passed 61-47 in Israel’s 120-seat parliament.
It stipulates a prime minister can only be deemed unfit to rule for health or mental reasons and only he or his government can make that decision.
It comes after the country’s attorney general has faced growing calls by opponents of Mr Netanyahu to declare him unfit to rule over his legal problems.
The attorney general has already barred Mr Netanyahu from involvement in the legal overhaul, saying he is at risk of a conflict of interest because of his corruption trial.
Mr Netanyahu is on trial for fraud, breach of trust and accepting bribes in a series of scandals involving wealthy associates and powerful media moguls.
He denies wrongdoing and dismisses critics who say he could find an escape route from the charges through the legal overhaul his government is advancing.
The government says the changes are necessary to restore a balance between the executive and judicial branches, which they say has become too interventionist in the way the country is run.
Critics say the government, Israel’s most right-wing, is pushing the country toward authoritarianism with its overhaul, which they say upends the country’s fragile system of checks and balances.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here