The investigation into the SNP’s finances has “moved beyond” the initial reports received, the outgoing chief constable of Police Scotland has said.
Sir Iain Livingstone also defended the time taken for the investigation.
In July 2021 the police confirmed they were investigating complaints made around donations to the SNP. This probe is known as Operation Branchform.
It followed allegations that £600,000 raised for campaigning towards Scottish independence was diverted elsewhere.
In the past several months, three figures in the party have been arrested in connection with the allegations: former leader Nicola Sturgeon; her husband, the former chief executive, Peter Murrell; and MSP Colin Beattie, who stood down as treasurer.
All were released without charge pending further inquiries. When she returned to Holyrood in June, Ms Sturgeon said she was certain she had done nothing wrong.
Speaking to journalists at an event in Glenrothes, Fife on Wednesday, First Minister and SNP leader Humza Yousaf said his party will continue to co-operate with the ongoing investigation.
He said: “I can’t (comment) because it’s a live police investigation. Obviously the comments Sir Iain Livingstone made are on behalf of Police Scotland and it is very much an operational matter for Police Scotland.
![](http://content.assets.pressassociation.io/2023/07/06121516/47ca3f76-d124-4d3a-8281-8f834db21cfc.jpg)
“All I can say is that the SNP will continue to do what we’ve done from day one and that’s fully co-operate with any police investigation.”
Sir Iain is stepping down as Scotland’s top police officer this August after six years in the job. He will be replaced by Jo Farrell, currently in charge of Durham Constabulary.
Speaking to Radio 4’s Today programme, Sir Iain was asked to address questions over the length of the two-year-long investigation.
He said: “Investigations into the finances of an organisation, the finances of individuals, are often complex.
“Investigations around fraud or investigations around potential embezzlement or investigations around the misuse of funds take time.”
Judicial warrants are needed to obtain financial records, he said.
Sir Iain said: “The time that’s been taken, in my judgment, is absolutely necessary. There’s been a prudent, thorough and proportionate investigation carried out.”
A dedicated team of specialists are involved, he said, who are working closely with prosecutors.
Sir Iain said that if the investigation had not taken place, he would have faced questions of dereliction of duty.
He was asked if the investigation had become “bigger” than the original inquiries.
He said: “It’s moved beyond what some of the initial reports were. That’s not uncommon in investigations such as this.”
Sir Iain said he would not put an “absolute timeframe” on the length of the investigation but that it would be “proportionate and timeous”.
The SNP has consistently said it will co-operate with the investigation.
A review of the party’s governance and transparency was ordered after Humza Yousaf became leader.
Responding to the chief constable’s comments, Scottish Conservative chairman Craig Hoy said: “Confirmation that the investigation into the SNP’s finances has moved beyond the initial complaint only highlights the seriousness of this investigation.”
Scottish Labour deputy leader Jackie Baillie said: “It is right that Police Scotland is investigating every aspect of this case. From what was a single complaint, it now appears that there are multiple lines of inquiry and a can of worms has opened up.
“It is clear that Chief Constable Livingstone and his officers are working hard to shine light on this unedifying period in Scottish politics.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel