The SNP has said it is looking to return to surplus this year, as the latest accounts show its deficit grew to more than £800,000.
Accounts published online by the Electoral Commission show the party’s income fell in 2022, while membership numbers were down by more than 8,600 in the first six months of 2023.
The SNP’s total income dropped to £4,248,625 in 2022, down from £4,529,960 in 2021.
With spending last year amounting to £5,052,284, the party recorded a deficit after tax of £804,278.
The deficit stood at £732,072 in 2021.
In the accounts, the SNP said “neither this deficit, nor the balance sheet are out of keeping with other years in which nationwide elections were fought”, with council elections having taken place across Scotland in 2022.
However the party added: “It will be important to seek to return the party to surplus in 2023 as we build towards the next general election.”
The accounts statement highlights the “huge significance of individual membership income and donations for the party”.
It shows the number of SNP members as of June 29 this year was 73,936.
That is down from 82,598 at the end of December 2022, and compares to the 103,884 members the SNP had at the end of December 2021.
The SNP’s income from members fell from £2,516,854 in 2021 to £2,286,944 in 2022.
The accounts said “overall membership payments decreased by 9% during 2022” – adding that since March last year, the party had “pre-empted cancellations” by offering its members the option of skipping their payments, taking a payment holiday, or lowering these through “reduced giving”.
Here the accounts noted: “Public concern about the economy and job security has understandably impacted on membership income in 2022, with the soaring costs of living being given as the reason for cancelling or lowering membership payments.”
Donations also fell, with income from these dropping from £695,351 in 2021 to £368,538 in 2022.
The accounts also show a fall in fundraising income, from £437,820 to £384,984.
However after Covid restrictions were lifted, the party’s conference income increased last year, going from £195,526 in 2021 to £515,951 in 2022.
Meanwhile a loan of £60,000 from the party’s “executive management” was still outstanding in 2022, according to the accounts, with former chief executive Peter Murrell – the husband of Nicola Sturgeon – having loaned money to the party.
Scottish Conservative chairman Craig Hoy said the accounts “paint a grim picture”.
Mr Hoy added: “The SNP also remains in debt to Peter Murrell to the tune of £60k, which is doubtless why Humza Yousaf failed to suspend him and his wife Nicola Sturgeon following their arrest as part of the (Police Scotland) Operation Branchform investigation.
“The SNP should do the right thing and pay off what it owes its disgraced ex-chief executive and finally sever ties with him.”
Scottish Labour deputy leader Dame Jackie Baillie said the accounts show “the SNP is a party in utter disarray”.
She added: “The financial chaos now engulfing the SNP goes to show how little the governing party can be trusted with Scotland’s finances.”
An SNP spokesperson said: “2022 was a challenging year for all political parties – with nationwide local authority elections, costs rising, and members understandably cutting back on donations due to a Westminster-made cost-of-living crisis.
“However, as we move forward, the SNP is determined to balance its accounts in preparation for the Westminster election in 2024.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel