Sir Keir Starmer has refused to commit to the continuation of the triple lock, but insisted there would be a “fair and decent pension” under a Labour government.
The Labour leader said he would not make manifesto commitments at this stage but blamed Rishi Sunak for the uncertainty facing pensioners.
The Government has insisted it is committed to the triple lock, but officials are considering tweaks to save money by changing the way the link to average earnings works.
Under the triple lock, pensions increase every year by inflation, average earnings or 2.5%, whichever is highest.
But neither Labour nor the Tories will commit to maintaining the policy beyond the general election.
And with the figure used for average earnings set to hand pensioners an 8.5% increase, the Treasury is examining whether to strip out the impact of public sector bonuses to result in a rise of around 7.8%.
That could see pensioners miss out on up to £75 a year but save the taxpayer hundreds of millions.
Asked whether the triple lock would continue under Labour, Sir Keir told Times Radio: “I’m not going to set out our plans for after the election.
“What I will say is this: it was this Government that made the commitment in relation to the triple lock. It’s this Government that ought to keep the commitment that they’ve made, and it’s this Government that’s introduced the doubt now about the triple lock by suggesting that they’re not going to keep their pledge.
“So that’s, I think, the most central issue for pensioners. But will pensioners have a decent and fair pension under a Labour government? Of course they will.”
In response to Unite union chief Sharon Graham’s criticism of Sir Keir’s Labour as a “90s tribute act”, he pointed out that Sir Tony Blair won a landslide in 1997.
He said his critics “are not focusing on the future, they’re focusing on the past”.
“We are looking at the challenge of the next general election. But I remind myself that in the late 1990s we had a landslide Labour government and I want to see a Labour government back in power as soon as possible.”
But he added: “I’m not predicting a landslide. I remind myself every day that for the Labour Party to get from where it landed in 2019 to even a slender majority at the next general election would require a bigger swing than we had in 1997.
“That’s the scale of the task that we face.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel