A Scottish Government minister has criticised the long-awaited inquiry into the Edinburgh Trams failures, saying its delivery was “too long and too costly” while some of its conclusions were not supported by evidence.
Transport Secretary Mairi McAllan said she received Lord Hardie’s full report on Tuesday morning, shortly before publication.
An inquiry into the delays and cost overruns of the project to build a tram line between Edinburgh Airport and York Place was ordered by Alex Salmond in 2014.
The full report runs to nearly 1,000 pages and makes 24 recommendations, including a review of how future inquiries should be conducted.
Lord Hardie said he holds Edinburgh City Council’s arm’s-length tram company TIE, the council and Scottish ministers “principally responsible for the failure to deliver the project on time, within budget and to the extent projected”.
Part of his report said the decision of John Swinney, who was finance secretary in 2007, to scale back the involvement of Transport Scotland was a mistake.
As politicians reacted to the report, SNP minister Ms McAllan took aim at the cost of the inquiry itself.
Lord Hardie said the inquiry cost £13.1 million to the end of July but the net cost to the public purse was kept to £8.7 million by using existing resources.
Ms McAllan said: “The Scottish Government places the highest importance on the efficient spending of public money.
“It is why the public inquiry was set up and given statutory powers to thoroughly investigate matters.
“It is also why we committed significant resources to diligently support the inquiry and to engage meaningfully and openly with it.
“However, the inquiry took too long, was too costly and in some instances the evidence heard does not support the conclusion drawn.”
She said she would make a more detailed statement to the Scottish Parliament in due course.
The Scottish Conservatives said Mr Swinney had questions to answer.
MSP Miles Briggs said: “Lord Hardie’s report is a scathing critique of the SNP government and City of Edinburgh Council’s roles in a national scandal.
“After years of delays and millions of pounds of public money, we at last have some conclusions on the appalling mishandling of Edinburgh’s tram network.”
He added: “He is clear that ministers failed to protect the public purse and acted in the SNP’s political interests, rather than the public interest.
“John Swinney, especially, has questions to answer for removing safeguards that would have protected grant funds.”
Cammy Day, the leader of Edinburgh council’s administration, said he would consider the report carefully.
He said: “From a first reading of the report, it’s clear that serious mistakes were made and that this had a significant impact on the city.
“There’s no getting away from the fact that the original project caused a great deal of disruption to residents and businesses, as well as damaging the city’s reputation, and on behalf of the council I want to apologise for this.
“I won’t, however, apologise for building a tram system or for our ambition to develop it further.
“After all, creating a better-connected, environmentally-friendly transport system is essential for a modern, successful city and we need to transform the way people move around if we are to achieve our net zero goals.”
He said the first part of the tram line had “flourished” in the nine years since it had opened and the latest route to Newhaven is “extremely popular”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here