An accountant who prepared Donald Trump’s financial statements for years is expected to return to the witness box for a second day in a trial over the former US president’s business practices.
Mr Trump, who spent a full day on Monday as an angry spectator at the civil trial, has said he will be back at the defence table.
“See you in Court on Tuesday morning!” Mr Trump posted on his Truth Social platform.
![Courtroom sketch shows former Donald Trump, left, seated at the defence table next to his lawyer Christopher Kise](http://content.assets.pressassociation.io/AP/2023/10/02/21f7844aca204d8cb24501d39a633078.jpg?w=640)
The trial is the culmination of a lawsuit in which attorney general Letitia James, a Democrat, has accused Mr Trump of deceiving banks, insurers and others for years by giving them papers that misstated the value of his assets.
Judge Arthur Engoron already delivered an early victory to Ms James, ruling that Mr Trump committed fraud by exaggerating the size of his penthouse at Trump Tower, claiming his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida was worth as much as 739 million US dollars (£612 million), and putting similar oversized valuations on office towers, golf courses and other assets.
The non-jury trial concerns six remaining claims in the lawsuit, and how much Mr Trump might owe in penalties. Ms James is seeking 250 million dollars (£207 million) and a ban on Mr Trump doing business in New York. The judge has already ruled that some of Mr Trump’s limited liability companies should be dissolved as punishment.
During the trial’s first day, Kevin Wallace, a lawyer for the attorney general, told the judge that Mr Trump and his company had lied “year after year after year” in his financial statements to make him look richer than he really was.
![New York attorney general Letitia James leaves the courtroom at the end of day one of evidence during the civil business fraud trial](http://content.assets.pressassociation.io/AP/2023/10/02/398aea232c9b4c4cab275717db46fdfe.jpg?w=640)
Mr Trump’s lawyers said the statements were legitimate representations of the worth of unique luxury properties, made even more valuable because of their association with Mr Trump. “That is not fraud. That is real estate,” lawyer Alina Habba said.
After staying away from a previous trial, in which his company and one of his top executives was convicted of tax fraud, Mr Trump spent hours sitting in court watching Monday’s opening statements, emerging several times to tell reporters that the trial was “a sham” intended to hurt his election prospects.
Visibly angry for much of the day, Mr Trump left claiming he had scored a victory, pointing to comments that he viewed as the judge coming around to the defence view that most of the allegations in the lawsuit are barred by the state’s statute of limitations.
After the first witness, Mazars LLP partner Donald Bender, gave evidence at length about Mr Trump’s 2011 financial statement, Judge Engoron questioned whether it might have been a waste of his time, because any fraud in the document would be beyond the legal time limit.
Mr Wallace promised to link it to a more recent loan agreement, but Mr Trump took the judge’s remarks as an “outstanding” development for him.
Mr Bender’s evidence is to resume on Tuesday. The trial is expected to last into December.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel