The Scottish Government is to share more than 14,000 messages with the UK Covid-19 Inquiry – with First Minister Humza Yousaf to hand over unredacted WhatsApp messages, MSPs have been told.
In a statement at Holyrood, Scottish Deputy First Minister Shona Robison confirmed the Scottish Government had received a legal notice permitting it to hand over the messages on Monday.
Messages, including those from Scottish Government ministers and former ministers, are included in that, Ms Robison said.
The First Minister, when submitting a statement to the UK Covid-19 Inquiry in the coming days, will “hand over WhatsApp messages unredacted to the inquiry”, she added.
The Deputy First Minister said a legal order, known as a Section 21 notice, had been required before the messages could be handed over because “a number of them were of a particularly personal nature, including photos of individuals’ children and personal medical details”.
With the order now received, Ms Robison told MSPs at Holyrood that work was “well under way” to ensure the messages would be handed over by the deadline set by the inquiry.
The Deputy First Minister added: “This will mean that all requested messages held will be shared, in full and unredacted, by November 6.”
She said the Scottish Government would “share over 14,000 mainly WhatsApp messages from various groups and individuals over the period of the pandemic”.
The Deputy First Minister added: “In instances where it appears as though messages may not be available, including through deletion in line with civil service policies on data management and retention, advice has been sought as to whether device owners or a third party are able to recover material.”
Ms Robison was giving a statement to MSPs at Holyrood after counsel to the inquiry Jamie Dawson KC revealed last week that “no messages” from within the Scottish Government had been provided.
There then followed press reports that former first minister Nicola Sturgeon, as well as national clinical director Professor Jason Leitch and chief medical officer Dr Sir Gregor Smith, had deleted their messages.
A spokeswoman for the former first minister said Ms Sturgeon would fully co-operate with the inquiries and she had just submitted her third written statement, which ran to about 200 pages.
Margaret Waterton, of the Scottish Covid Bereaved Group, claimed it was “shameful” the Scottish Government had not yet provided the information.
Speaking to BBC Radio Scotland on Tuesday, Ms Waterton, who lost her mother and husband to the illness, said: “The situation this week with Scottish Government not having brought forward the information that it was requested to provide to the inquiry some considerable time ago, I think, frankly, is shameful.”
Opposition politicians at Holyrood pressed Ms Robison on the deleted messages, with Scottish Conservative leader Douglas Ross claiming “the stench of secrecy from this Government is overpowering”.
He asked if the 14,000 messages to be handed over would include “all messages” from Ms Sturgeon and Mr Leitch.
Adding that the Scottish Government had been told in June 2021 not to destroy any communications relating to the pandemic, Mr Ross added that anyone who had deleted messages after this date “would have broken the law”.
Ms Robison, however, said she could not say who the messages to be handed over to the inquiry were from, or what their content is, explaining that was “the confidential nature of what the inquiry has asked for”.
She added it was “in the gift of the inquiry itself” if any of them would be made public.
Scottish Labour deputy leader Jackie Baillie claimed messages had been “destroyed on an industrial scale”.
She said: “A public inquiry was talked about in May 2020. Why did ministers not retain evidence from then?
“It is inconceivable that a former first minister would not understand the importance of that evidence.”
Scottish Liberal Democrat leader Alex Cole-Hamilton, meanwhile, questioned if “life and death judgments” during the pandemic had ever “hinged around Nicola Sturgeon’s desire just to be different” from the then UK prime minister Boris Johnson.
On this, he said “we may never know” because “messages deleted at the very top of the Scottish Government erased the process by which ministers weighed the politics and science behind the decisions required of them”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel